# Google opposes site blocking in the EU Google warns against blocking illegal streaming sites. - **Source:** [Mashable](https://brifing.si/source/3cd6d1d0-9c29-4750-8bc9-f2afefb52505) - **Published:** 2026-07-12 - **Topic:** [Leadership](https://brifing.si/c/leadership) - **Original article:** - **On Brifing:** https://brifing.si/s/0a55f0fe-9529-4325-85a3-b164abd8cfab ## Google's objection Google is challenging a French court order to block illegal streaming sites. The company argues such blocks would have broad and disproportionate effects. It particularly notes that DNS and IP blocking would also impact innocent users. ## Blocking challenges Blocking illegal sites is technically complex. These sites typically use multiple domains and servers. Google suggests blocking efforts can be easily bypassed while failing to catch the actual targets. ## Collateral damage Broad internet blocks could accidentally restrict access to legitimate websites. Google's report cites examples where sites like Amnesty International were mistakenly blocked. This poses a serious threat to internet freedom. ## Legal debates EU's internet regulation efforts are causing tension between tech giants and media publishers. While organizations like Google and EFF argue such regulations threaten the open nature of the internet, copyright holders demand protection. ## Global implications These EU debates appear to be spreading to the US, with similar laws being discussed in Congress. This could signal a global struggle over internet governance and digital rights management. ## The need for balance Google's objection highlights the importance of finding balance in the digital world. A middle ground must be found between copyright protection and internet freedom. This debate is crucial for the future of digital rights. ## Sources covering this story - https://mashable.com/tech/google-comes-out-against-site-blocking-and-their-rationales-are-surprisingly — --- _Summary written by Brifing from the original reporting. Copyright in the original article belongs to its publisher; read the full piece at the link above._