# Chemists Still Rely on Hazardous Solvents Despite Green Chemistry Push

Decades of efforts fail to curb use of toxic solvents in pharmaceutical research.

- **Source:** [Nature](https://brifing.si/source/4d850c3b-dd79-4024-bc91-db2571889199)
- **Published:** 2026-09-25
- **Topic:** [Business](https://brifing.si/c/business)
- **Original article:** <https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-03023-0>
- **On Brifing:** https://brifing.si/s/0c1d59fc-db90-4cf5-a443-d0666567e4a0

## Persistent hazardous solvent use

A comprehensive analysis of 1.3 million chemical reactions from patents reveals hazardous solvents were used in 70% of reactions by 2016, up from 60% in 1976. This contradicts three decades of green chemistry initiatives. Common offenders include dichloromethane (DCM) and trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), both with significant health and environmental risks. The findings highlight the chemical industry's resistance to adopting safer alternatives despite known dangers.

## Pharmaceutical sector's role

Many patents analyzed relate to early-stage drug discovery, where chemists prioritize speed over sustainability. The study found zero incentive for discovery chemists to use environmentally friendly conditions. Particularly concerning is the rising use of TFA, a PFAS 'forever chemical' crucial for synthesizing popular peptide drugs. This suggests the pharmaceutical industry bears significant responsibility for persistent hazardous solvent use.

## Regulatory limitations exposed

When regulations restrict one toxic solvent, chemists typically switch to another hazardous option rather than adopting greener alternatives. The study's AI system, Rxn-INSIGHT, tracked over 500 reaction types across four decades to reveal this pattern. This regulatory loophole demonstrates how environmental protections can be circumvented without systemic changes to chemical research practices.

## AI-powered chemical analysis

Researchers used an AI system called Rxn-INSIGHT to analyze a massive database of chemical reactions from US patents. The system converted chemical names and structures into computer-readable formats, enabling large-scale solvent use tracking. This represents one of the first comprehensive applications of machine learning to assess chemical sustainability across decades of research.

## Data limitations

The study has several blind spots: it only includes data through 2016 and doesn't measure solvent quantities. Laboratory miniaturization trends may be reducing overall solvent use despite persistent hazardous choices. Also, while patents reflect early research, manufacturing processes often eliminate hazardous solvents later. These gaps suggest the problem might be slightly less severe than the data indicates.

## Industry resistance to change

Chemists continue relying on hazardous solvents due to literature precedent and established workflows. The petrochemical origin of most solvents creates additional industry inertia. Organic chemist Bruce Lipshutz emphasizes the urgent need to move away from petrochemical-based solvents, stating simply: 'We have to stop.' This resistance persists despite growing environmental awareness.

## Environmental consequences

The continued use of solvents like DCM and TFA contributes significantly to environmental contamination. TFA belongs to the PFAS family of 'forever chemicals' accumulating in waterways and living organisms. Nearly all solvents derive from oil or natural gas, compounding their environmental impact through both production and persistent pollution.

## Call for systemic change

The findings underscore the need for fundamental shifts in chemical research practices. Researchers suggest combining regulatory pressure with incentives for green chemistry adoption. The study serves as a wake-up call for medicinal chemistry groups to reevaluate solvent choices. Without systemic changes, decades more of hazardous solvent use likely lie ahead.

## Sources covering this story

- https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-03023-0 — 

---

_Summary written by Brifing from the original reporting. Copyright in the original article belongs to its publisher; read the full piece at the link above._
