# EU Lawmakers Propose Easing 2035 CO2 Emission Targets for New Cars

Parliament committee votes to lower 100% reduction goal to 87.5% for passenger vehicles.

- **Source:** [Notícias ao Minuto](https://www.noticiasaominuto.com)
- **Published:** 2026-11-04
- **Topic:** [climate](https://brifing.si/c/climate)
- **Original article:** <
                https://www.noticiasaominuto.com/auto/3078540/eurodeputados-propoem-flexibilizar-metas-de-co2-para-automoveis-ate-2035#utm_source=rss-ultima-hora&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rssfeed
                >
- **On Brifing:** https://brifing.si/s/0fd6b075-aec2-4074-9e99-d42aeb85e728

## Proposed Emission Target Adjustment

The European Parliament's Environment Committee has voted to reduce the 2035 CO2 emission target for new passenger cars from 100% to 87.5%. This proposal, which passed with 48 votes in favor and 30 against, marks a significant shift in the regulatory framework intended to govern the European automotive sector's transition toward cleaner energy standards.

## Carbon Credit and Compensation

Manufacturers would be required to offset remaining emissions by utilizing credits derived from low-carbon steel produced within the European Union. This mechanism aims to reach a 95% target by compensating for the 7.5% of emissions remaining after the initial reduction, effectively integrating industrial manufacturing standards into the broader automotive decarbonization strategy for the region.

## Commercial Vehicle Emission Targets

For light commercial vehicles, the committee proposed distinct reduction targets of 35% by 2030 and 80% by 2035. These specific benchmarks reflect a tiered approach to decarbonizing the logistics and transport sectors, ensuring that different vehicle categories face regulatory pressures that align with their operational capabilities and the current state of available technology.

## Incentives for Efficient Vehicles

The proposal introduces super-credits for small electric vehicles and highly energy-efficient models manufactured within the European Union. Additionally, lawmakers advocate for classifying vehicles powered exclusively by specific renewable or low-carbon fuels as zero-emission vehicles, potentially broadening the scope of technologies that qualify under the new environmental compliance framework for European automakers.

## Streamlining Environmental Assessments

Beyond vehicle emissions, the committee approved measures to limit environmental project assessments to 300 days, with a possible 60-day extension for complex projects. The plan also reduces the deadline for determining if a full assessment is required from 60 to 45 days, aiming to accelerate infrastructure development while maintaining necessary environmental oversight standards.

## Administrative and Procedural Reforms

Proposed reforms include strengthening the single point of contact for project promoters, simplifying document submission, and digitizing administrative procedures. While lawmakers support accelerating judicial processes for strategic projects, they rejected the concept of tacit approval for administrative stages, ensuring that authorities remain accountable for meeting established deadlines throughout the project evaluation lifecycle.

## Legislative Path and Negotiations

The mandate for negotiating these environmental proposals with the Council of the European Union is scheduled for a plenary vote in December. Meanwhile, the environmental assessment proposal faces a separate plenary vote between November 23 and 26, setting the stage for complex inter-institutional discussions regarding the future of European climate policy.

## Broader Industrial Implications

These legislative shifts reflect the ongoing tension between aggressive climate goals and the economic competitiveness of the European automotive industry. As Portugal and other member states seek to attract new manufacturing facilities, the final outcome of these negotiations will likely influence investment decisions and the long-term strategic direction of the European automotive market.

---

_Summary written by Brifing from the original reporting. Copyright in the original article belongs to its publisher; read the full piece at the link above._