# Éric Sadin: The Existential Risk of Delegating Human Thought to AI Philosopher Éric Sadin warns that generative AI threatens our fundamental capacity for human judgment. - **Source:** [Perfil](https://www.perfil.com) - **Published:** 2026-11-08 - **Topic:** [technology](https://brifing.si/c/technology) - **Original article:** - **On Brifing:** https://brifing.si/s/138910c1-8a0f-40ae-9a2a-9f5a9f03f4d4 ## The November 2022 Rupture Philosopher Éric Sadin identifies the launch of ChatGPT on November 30, 2022, as a historic turning point. He argues this event marked a shift from using technology as a physical tool to delegating our core intellectual and creative faculties to machines, fundamentally altering the trajectory of human civilization and individual agency. ## Delegation of the Soul Sadin posits that generative AI systems now perform tasks that have defined human existence since time immemorial. By relying on machines to write, speak, and decide for us, humanity risks eroding its vital center. He describes this process as a dangerous surrender of our internal life to standardized, mathematical, and lifeless systems. ## The Illusion of Progress Despite the profound risks, Sadin observes a global trend of uncritical celebration regarding AI adoption. He argues that society failed to exercise Aristotelian phronesis, or practical wisdom, when faced with these powerful tools. Instead of caution, there was a collective rush to integrate systems that prescribe behavior and dictate our daily choices. ## Historical Technical Evolution Technological history previously involved prosthetics that extended physical capabilities, such as speed or strength. Even the Industrial Revolution, while dehumanizing labor, did not replace our cognitive core. Sadin emphasizes that the current era is distinct because it targets the very essence of human thought, reflection, and the ability to analyze situations. ## The Silicolonization Concept Sadin coined the term silicolonization to describe the global imposition of Silicon Valley's economic model. Cities worldwide have attempted to replicate this tech-centric approach without questioning its societal impact. This model prioritizes industrial efficiency over democratic debate, effectively bypassing the collective political process required to decide the future of our shared society. ## Hatred of Human Imperfection The ideology driving AI development often views human existence as flawed or incomplete. Figures like Geoffrey Hinton have suggested that humans may not be the superior form of intelligence. Sadin critiques this perspective as a form of self-hatred that seeks to replace human unpredictability with optimized, error-free, and sterile algorithmic systems. ## The Death of Language Sadin characterizes the output of generative AI as a language of death—standardized, necrosed, and devoid of vital breath. When systems dictate our words and actions, their output gains the status of absolute truth. This shift undermines our capacity for nuance, personal expression, and the messy reality of human experience and dialogue. ## Erosion of the Other Human learning and thought have historically relied on interaction with others, including the possibility of disagreement and error. By relying on AI for decisions—such as choosing restaurants or social connections—we remove the necessity of asking others for input. This isolationist trend threatens the social fabric and our capacity for empathy. ## The Political Vacuum The rapid deployment of AI has occurred without public consensus or political deliberation. Leaders have supported these industrial projects as inevitable, leaving society with no voice in the transformation. Sadin argues that recovering our ability to decide collectively is essential to prevent the total abandonment of our most fundamental human faculties. ## Living with the Unexpected True human experience involves dealing with limits, frustration, and the unexpected. AI systems aim to eliminate these elements by calculating the best possible outcome for every situation. Sadin warns that by accepting this optimization, we negate the very conditions that make history possible and allow for genuine human responsibility and action. ## The Four-Year Horizon With four years passed since the launch of ChatGPT and four years remaining until 2030, Sadin calls for urgent reflection. He urges society to analyze these developments independently, free from the influence of powerful industrial interests. We must decide whether to continue this path or reclaim our intellectual and creative autonomy. ## A Call for Awareness Sadin concludes that the current trajectory leads to a desert of the self, where human freedom is sacrificed for efficiency. He emphasizes that the path forward requires a conscious mobilization of society. We must recognize the stakes of this anthropological shift before our capacity for independent thought is permanently lost. ## Sources covering this story - https://perfil.com/periodismo-puro/eric-sadinno-se-puede-ser-anticapitalista-o-rechazar-el-avion-y-despues-usar-chatgpt-o-claude-a73zh4a3HSlH — --- _Summary written by Brifing from the original reporting. Copyright in the original article belongs to its publisher; read the full piece at the link above._