# Internal Police Messages Reveal Political Pressure Behind Commissioner's Removal Leaked communications suggest the Senate police chief's reassignment followed direct external instructions. - **Source:** [El Mundo – España](https://www.elmundo.es/espana) - **Published:** 2026-11-04 - **Topic:** [politics](https://brifing.si/c/politics) - **Original article:** - **On Brifing:** https://brifing.si/s/1455715e-bd3d-4ffb-9339-e4e0627d77ef ## Leaked Internal Communication A leaked WhatsApp message from a senior coordinator reveals that Commissioner Julian Puente faced restricted authority upon his transfer. The message, sent on June 15, 2026, explicitly mentions that the decision to limit his operational scope was based on specific instructions received, rather than purely organizational or professional criteria within the force. ## The Senate Dismissal Julian Puente was removed from his position as head of the Senate Special Commissariat on June 12, 2026. The official resolution, signed by Police Director General Francisco Pardo, cited a loss of confidence and concerns regarding Puente's leadership style. This move triggered significant internal debate regarding the autonomy of police command structures. ## Political Context of Removal The controversy stems from an incident on March 2, 2026, involving television collaborator Sarah Santaolalla and reporter Vito Quiles at the Senate. Following the confrontation, the PSOE expressed public dissatisfaction with the police response. Puente’s associates claim this political pressure directly influenced the subsequent decision to remove him from his post. ## Allegations of Professional Retaliation Within the National Police, several senior commissioners have expressed growing unease regarding recent personnel changes. Many believe these reassignments are not based on service requirements but function as professional retaliation against those who disagree with the police leadership's execution of directives. The Ministry of the Interior has declined to provide any official comment. ## The Coordinator's Explicit Admission The coordinator who sent the message to the zonal group admitted that Puente would have little room for maneuver in his new role. He stated, 'Possibly it leaves little room for his work, but I have to do it this way,' citing both received instructions and his own prior experience as the primary justification. ## Institutional Tension and Oversight The case highlights a friction point between political oversight and police operational independence. By linking the removal of a high-ranking officer to a specific political complaint from the PSOE, the situation raises questions about how external political pressure impacts the career paths and decision-making autonomy of senior law enforcement officials in Spain. ## Puente's Legal Defense Julian Puente has formally contested his dismissal, presenting 14 specific points of incongruence regarding the official reasons provided for his removal. His defense argues that the administrative justification is inconsistent with the timeline of events and the nature of his duties, suggesting that the official narrative masks the true political motivations involved. ## Broader Implications for Policing This episode underscores the sensitivity of police management in the current political climate. As internal dissent grows among high-ranking officers, the reliance on private messaging groups to communicate sensitive personnel decisions has exposed the underlying tensions. Observers are now watching to see if further evidence of political interference in police operations emerges. ## Sources covering this story - https://www.elmundo.es/espana/2026/11/04/6aeb8687e4d4d8453d8b45c8.html — --- _Summary written by Brifing from the original reporting. Copyright in the original article belongs to its publisher; read the full piece at the link above._