# Saudi Ministry of Education Concludes First Phase of Administrative Performance Evaluation Failure to complete self-assessment by today restricts employees from receiving top performance ratings. - **Source:** [Okaz](https://www.okaz.com.sa) - **Published:** 2026-11-10 - **Topic:** [careers](https://brifing.si/c/careers) - **Original article:** - **On Brifing:** https://brifing.si/s/1a6f3fb6-5374-41fe-8660-43827d0ec721 ## Evaluation Deadline Today The Saudi Ministry of Education concludes the first phase of its administrative performance evaluation today, Wednesday. This initial stage, which began on November 1, requires all administrative staff in public schools to complete a mandatory self-assessment. This process applies to employees across all three educational stages in various regions and governorates. ## Consequences of Non-Compliance Failure to complete the self-assessment process carries significant professional consequences for staff. According to the official evaluation guide, employees who do not finalize their self-assessment are ineligible to receive a rating of 4 or 5. These top two tiers represent the highest performance levels within the ministry's five-point grading scale system. ## Scope of Affected Personnel The evaluation framework encompasses a diverse range of staff members within the public education sector. This includes permanent administrative employees, wage-based workers, and those hired under specific competency contracts. By including various employment categories, the ministry aims to standardize performance measurement across all operational roles within the school environment for consistency. ## Distribution of Performance Ratings The ministry has implemented a strict distribution quota for performance ratings to maintain objectivity. Specifically, 20% of staff may be rated as exemplary, 25% as exceeding expectations, and 55% fall into the remaining categories. These include meeting expectations, needing development, or unsatisfactory, ensuring a balanced spread of performance outcomes across the workforce. ## Managerial Role in Assessment School principals play a critical role by assigning the final overall performance rating to their subordinates. This assessment is based on a comprehensive review of the employee's achievements and competencies throughout the performance cycle. The manager's final judgment serves as the definitive description of the employee's total professional level for the year. ## Structured Grievance Procedure The ministry has established a formal, multi-step path for employees to contest their final evaluation results. The process begins with a formal grievance request submitted by the employee, which is then reviewed by the direct manager. Following this, the case moves to primary and main grievance committees within the local education administration. ## Finalizing Grievance Outcomes Once the main grievance committee completes its study and issues a recommendation, it is sent to the authorized official for final approval. After the authority validates the decision, the outcome is officially updated in the employee's account within the Fares electronic system. This ensures transparency and accountability throughout the entire appeal process. ## Strategic Importance of Evaluation This evaluation cycle reflects the ministry's broader efforts to professionalize administrative functions within the Saudi public education sector. By linking self-assessment to performance ratings and providing a clear appeal mechanism, the ministry fosters a culture of accountability. These systematic measures are designed to align individual staff contributions with overall institutional objectives. ## Sources covering this story - https://www.okaz.com.sa/local/na/2274994 — --- _Summary written by Brifing from the original reporting. Copyright in the original article belongs to its publisher; read the full piece at the link above._