Brifing

Navigating Value Creation and Capture Across AI-Enabled Ecosystems

Strategic choices in ecosystem configurations dictate competitive dynamics for AI innovators and adopters.

1General-Purpose Foundations of AI

Artificial intelligence acts as a general-purpose technology, driving multiple distinct value propositions simultaneously. Rather than operating in isolated silos, these propositions materialize across interconnected ecosystems. Value realization depends heavily on coordinating contributions among varied platform participants rather than relying purely on standalone algorithmic performance.

2Innovator Scope and Focus

AI innovators face fundamental strategic decisions regarding which specific value propositions to address. Leaders must evaluate whether broad platform coverage provides defensible scale or if targeting niche, high-value domains yields faster commercial traction. This initial scoping directly influences long-term resource allocation and ecosystem influence.

3Specialized Versus General Architecture

Technology providers must determine whether to deploy general-purpose foundational architectures or domain-specialized models. General solutions offer broad market applicability but face commoditization risks. Specialized offerings capture higher domain-specific rents yet require substantial contextual training data and distinct vertical integration efforts.

4Open and Closed Offer Strategies

Ecosystem orchestrators must decide whether to release models as open-source assets or closed proprietary platforms. Open models accelerate developer adoption and collective complementary innovation. Proprietary systems protect underlying intellectual property, enabling tighter governance and monetization pathways despite higher barriers to initial widespread ecosystem entry.

5User Configurations of Complements

Adopting enterprises act as strategic ecosystem participants rather than passive technology buyers. Users must evaluate alternative configurations of focal AI solutions combined with proprietary complementary assets. Selecting the right combination determines how effectively organizations deliver unique value propositions within their specific industry contexts.

6Dynamic Shifts in Ecosystem Roles

Ongoing strategic choices made by innovators and users continuously reshape ecosystem hierarchies over time. Complementary providers can evolve into direct platform competitors as functional capabilities expand. Similarly, powerful enterprise adopters can commoditize core AI models by controlling exclusive downstream data pipelines and integration layers.

7Balancing Creation Against Capture

Delivering broad systemic value does not guarantee economic rent capture for the foundational AI innovator. Organizations must secure bottleneck assets, such as unique workflow integration or differentiated operational data. Without defensive mechanisms, value created across the broader network inevitably migrates toward complementors or downstream enterprise aggregators.

8Strategic Mandates for Executives

Corporate leaders must view AI deployment as an evolving multi-actor network rather than a static procurement decision. Monitoring shifts across partner complements, architectural open standards, and proprietary boundaries enables firms to reposition effectively. Sustained advantage requires continuously recalibrating ecosystem governance against emerging competitive threats.

Original article: Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal — Navigating Value Creation and Capture Across AI-Enabled Ecosystems