# Fired California Judge Sues Over Alleged Illegal Insurance Rate Approvals Lawsuit claims department officials bypassed judicial oversight to approve insurance rate hikes improperly. - **Source:** [CalMatters](https://calmatters.org) - **Published:** 2026-11-11 - **Topic:** [politics](https://brifing.si/c/politics) - **Original article:** - **On Brifing:** https://brifing.si/s/27a2b22f-4a78-454d-b470-2feb432850c5 ## Judge Challenges Department Authority Kristin Rosi, the former chief administrative law judge for California’s Insurance Department, filed a lawsuit in Alameda County Superior Court. She alleges that Commissioner Ricardo Lara and special counsel Lucy Wang retaliated against her. The suit claims officials pressured her to ignore legal procedures regarding insurance rate hike approvals for homeowners. ## Allegations of Procedural Misconduct The lawsuit contends that the department frequently breached the separation between its executive, legal, and judicial branches. Rosi alleges that officials bypassed established insurance laws to approve rate increases. These actions reportedly occurred without following codified regulations, effectively undermining the neutral forum intended for fair and independent evidentiary hearings and mediations. ## Retaliation and Judicial Interference Rosi claims she faced retaliation after refusing to comply with orders to revoke or change her rulings. The lawsuit states that Commissioner Lara personally emailed her, instructing her to align with the department's plans. Officials allegedly attempted to restrict the jurisdiction of administrative judges to ensure specific outcomes in rate proceedings. ## Impact on Insurance Premiums Home insurance premiums in California have surged by 23% since 2023, according to data from Bankrate.com. The lawsuit suggests that these increases were facilitated by settlement agreements that lacked proper legal standing. These processes allegedly favored insurance companies while excluding stakeholders like ratepayers and advocacy groups from the required transparent review. ## Ex Parte Communication Concerns The complaints highlight that department officials, including Wang and Lara, allegedly held private meetings with the legal team regarding active cases. Such conduct mirrors improper ex parte communications in standard litigation, where a judge meets with one side without the other present. This practice violates the requirement for neutral, multi-stakeholder evidentiary hearings. ## Broader Departmental Controversy Commissioner Lara’s eight-year tenure has faced significant criticism, including allegations regarding insurance industry donations and controversial overseas travel. The department is currently understaffed, with only one administrative law judge remaining. Former commissioner Dave Jones described the allegations as shocking, emphasizing that the commissioner should be walled off from judicial proceedings. ## Calls for Immediate Investigation Consumer advocates and former officials are demanding accountability for the alleged misconduct. Harvey Rosenfield of Consumer Watchdog labeled the situation scandalous, while Dave Jones urged the incoming commissioner, Jane Kim, to launch an immediate internal investigation. Kim has pledged to prioritize transparency and accountability regarding rate decisions upon taking office in January. ## Legal Path and Future Outlook The first case management conference for Rosi’s lawsuit is scheduled for February 16. While Lucy Wang, now representing insurance companies, declined to comment, the Attorney General’s office is handling the defense. The outcome of this litigation could fundamentally reshape how California manages insurance rate reviews and maintains the independence of its judicial branch. ## Sources covering this story - https://calmatters.org/economy/2026/11/ricardo-lara-sued-by-judge/ — --- _Summary written by Brifing from the original reporting. Copyright in the original article belongs to its publisher; read the full piece at the link above._