Beau Lamarre-Condon Denies Assassination Plot in Double Murder Trial
Former officer claims self-defense in the deaths of Jesse Baird and Luke Davies.
1Defendant Testifies in Court
Beau Lamarre-Condon has spent days in the witness box at the NSW Supreme Court in Sydney. The former police officer faces double murder charges for the deaths of Jesse Baird and Luke Davies. He maintains his innocence, arguing that the fatal shootings on February 19, 2024, occurred during acts of self-defense.
2Disputing Assassination Allegations
Prosecutor Brett Hatfield SC challenged the defendant, suggesting he purchased disguise items to execute a premeditated plan to assassinate Jesse Baird. Lamarre-Condon rejected these claims, asserting he only wore a motorcycle helmet and high-vis clothing to avoid recognition while retrieving personal belongings from the Paddington share house after their relationship ended.
3The Struggle for Control
Lamarre-Condon testified that he shot Baird after being startled, claiming Baird lunged at him with a knife. Regarding the death of Luke Davies, he alleged that a struggle ensued over his police-issued pistol. He maintains his finger was not on the trigger when the weapon discharged during the physical altercation.
4Questioning Mental Health Claims
The defense highlighted Lamarre-Condon’s history of poor mental health, including a reported suicide attempt in October 2023. The prosecution countered these claims, suggesting the defendant was homicidal rather than suicidal. Prosecutors argued that Lamarre-Condon is attempting to garner sympathy from the jury by fabricating details about his psychological state during the trial.
5CCTV and Behavioral Evidence
The court reviewed CCTV footage showing the defendant near the property hours before the incident. Prosecutors questioned his behavior, including footage of him laughing at a restaurant the day after the shootings. Lamarre-Condon described his demeanor as a state of detachment, while the prosecution framed his actions as calculated and cold.
6Allegations of Witness Influence
Tensions rose as the prosecution questioned a December 2025 conversation between the defendant and a friend. Prosecutors suggested Lamarre-Condon attempted to influence the friend's future testimony regarding the events inside the Paddington property. The defendant denied these accusations, insisting he only wanted the truth to be told during the legal proceedings.
7Police Equipment Usage
A critical point of the trial involves the use of a police-issued firearm during the incident. The prosecution focused on the defendant's access to his service weapon while off-duty. Lamarre-Condon’s testimony regarding how the gun was handled during the struggle remains a central point of contention between the defense and the Crown.
8Ongoing Legal Proceedings
Now seven weeks into the trial, the case continues to examine the sequence of events at the Paddington home. The jury must weigh the defendant's claims of self-defense against the prosecution's narrative of premeditated murder. Further testimony is expected as the court works toward a verdict in this high-profile criminal matter.