# Creating Illusory Lenticular Portraits Using 3D Printing Technology Transforming flat photographs into dynamic, angle-dependent 3D prints with specialized generative software. - **Source:** [How-To Geek](https://www.howtogeek.com) - **Published:** 2026-10-31 - **Topic:** [Software & Engineering](https://brifing.si/c/engineering) - **Original article:** - **On Brifing:** https://brifing.si/s/2b1c18bb-56e4-488b-9406-fab4e694e444 ## Beyond Standard 3D Printing While 3D printing is typically associated with functional spare parts or articulated figures, it offers significant potential for visual art. Moving beyond simple lithophanes, which rely on variable plastic thickness to block light, creators can now produce lenticular prints that display different images depending on the viewer's specific physical angle. ## The Lenticular Illusion Mechanism Traditional lenticular cards use physical lenses to bend light, revealing alternating image strips. However, 3D-printed versions achieve this effect without actual lenses. Instead, specialized software uses complex mathematical algorithms to generate a 3D structure that mimics the visual layering effect, allowing two distinct images to coexist within one physical print. ## Software Requirements and Licensing LuBan serves as the primary generative design tool for this process, converting 2D inputs into 3D models. The software operates on a subscription model, costing 30 dollars monthly or 150 dollars annually. Notably, it includes a credit system where payments eventually convert into a lifetime license once the total reaches 750 dollars. ## Workflow for Lenticular Prints The process begins in the LuBan macOS interface under the Photo Magic menu. Users select the Lenticule model type and upload two source photos. Parameters such as model size, thickness, and support bar density must be manually configured, requiring iterative testing to ensure the specific 3D printer can successfully handle the geometry. ## Slicing and Printing Challenges Printing these models requires careful orientation, as standard slicers often default to an suboptimal face-down position. Flipping the model can improve the quality of the first layer. Furthermore, achieving high-resolution results often necessitates using a smaller nozzle, as standard 4mm nozzles may struggle to resolve the fine lines required for realistic photos. ## Optimization and Resolution Limits Testing revealed that 200x200mm prints at 0.1 resolution are suitable for simple graphics like logos or cartoons. However, realistic photographs demand lower resolution settings at that scale to avoid print failures. Users must balance image resolution against the physical constraints of their hardware to prevent the loss of critical detail during extrusion. ## Experimental Software Capabilities Beyond lenticular prints, LuBan functions as a comprehensive suite for generative design. The software includes tools for creating 3D puzzles and extruding 2D photos into complex models. These features offer additional utility for makers looking to utilize excess filament while exploring the intersection of traditional photography and modern additive manufacturing techniques. ## Future of Generative Art This technique demonstrates the evolving capability of generative software to bridge the gap between digital imagery and physical fabrication. While LuBan is currently a primary option, the existence of alternative software suggests a growing niche in 3D printing. Continued experimentation with these tools will likely refine the precision of illusory prints. ## Sources covering this story - https://www.howtogeek.com/3d-printing-process-turned-flat-photos-into-illusory-lenticular-portraits/ — --- _Summary written by Brifing from the original reporting. Copyright in the original article belongs to its publisher; read the full piece at the link above._