Brifing

Macroprudential regulation and banks' liquidity provision

Study examines regulatory impacts on banks' capacity to supply liquidity services

1Purpose of macroprudential regulation

Macroprudential regulations aim to ensure stability across the financial system. These policies govern banks' capital and liquidity adequacy to reduce systemic risks. Gaining prominence after the 2008 financial crisis, this approach has become a key tool for central banks. It has proven effective particularly in preventing credit expansion bubbles and asset price inflation.

2Economic role of liquidity services

Banks' liquidity provision function is critical for sustaining economic activities. Meeting corporate cash needs and offering consumer credit form core components of these services. Through liquidity transformation, banks convert short-term deposits into long-term loans. This process represents one of the most important benefits of financial intermediation.

3Research methodology

Josef Schroth's 2026 study analyzes data from over 200 banks across 30 developed and emerging economies. Using panel data analysis, it examines how macroprudential policies affect bank balance sheets. The research specifically measures regulatory impacts on liquidity ratios and net interest margins. The study also evaluates implementation outcomes of Basel III regulations.

4Key findings

The research shows stricter macroprudential measures reduce banks' liquidity supply by 12-15% on average. Small and medium-sized banks are particularly more affected by these regulations. However, systemic risk reduction has been observed to enhance long-term financial stability. The frequency of liquidity crises decreased by up to 20% according to the findings.

5Sectoral impacts

Mortgage and consumer loans were most affected by regulations, while corporate banking products experienced relatively less impact. Slowed credit growth in housing markets curbed price increases by 3-5%. Consolidation trends strengthened in financial services, with banks' profitability indicators declining by 8% on average.

6Policy implications

The study emphasizes policymakers must maintain balance in regulatory design. It warns excessive strictness may constrain credit supply and slow economic growth. The research recommends tailoring optimal policy mixes to countries' financial development levels. Gradual transition models are particularly advised for emerging economies.

7Banks' adaptation strategies

Findings indicate banks are innovating in liquidity management approaches. Digital channel utilization and alternative funding source development efforts stand out. Investments in risk management systems have increased by 45% since 2020. Fintech collaborations and blockchain-based solutions are also proving effective in reducing compliance costs.

8Future projections

The study predicts macroprudential policies will remain permanent features of global finance. Regulatory frameworks are expected to further evolve by 2030, incorporating climate risks into policy design. AI and machine learning applications in liquidity management are forecast to expand. Maintaining balance between financial stability and economic growth is highlighted as crucial.

Original article: Journal of Financial Economics — Makro ihtiyati düzenlemeler ve bankaların likidite hizmetleri