# London Underground Drivers Announce Series of Strikes Over Four-Day Week Dispute RMT union members plan multiple 24-hour walkouts opposing Transport for London's new working arrangements. - **Source:** [BBC News – UK](https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk) - **Published:** 2026-11-06 - **Topic:** [careers](https://brifing.si/c/careers) - **Original article:** - **On Brifing:** https://brifing.si/s/3868d02e-23da-48b2-b334-2894cab9d012 ## Planned Strike Schedule The RMT union has announced a series of 24-hour strikes starting 26 November. Further walkouts are scheduled for 17 and 19 December, followed by dates in January and February 2027. These actions stem from a long-running dispute regarding proposed changes to working arrangements for London Underground train drivers. ## Core Union Objections General secretary Eddie Dempsey claims the proposal is a wholesale attack on working conditions disguised as a voluntary four-day week. The union argues drivers will face longer, unpredictable shifts and increased time spent driving. Furthermore, the RMT fears these changes will eventually lead to hundreds of job cuts across the network. ## Management Proposal Details Transport for London aims to reduce the average working week from 36 to 35 hours by introducing paid meal breaks. Management asserts the change is voluntary, allowing drivers to choose between a four or five-day week. They promise that those remaining on five-day rosters will face no detriment to their status. ## Union Division Emerges The Aslef union, which also represents many drivers, expressed surprise at the RMT's decision to strike. Aslef organizer Finn Brennan stated the plan offers 35 extra days off annually based on a 34-hour week. They view the strike as an attempt to block members from choosing a shorter, more flexible working week. ## Divergent Working Demands While TfL proposes a 35-hour week, the RMT is demanding a 32-hour week spread over four days. The union argues this would maintain current salary levels while reducing weekly hours by three. They remain opposed to the current management framework, citing concerns over the erosion of long-standing negotiated agreements and conditions. ## Operational and Economic Impact BusinessLDN warns that these strikes will likely disrupt the hospitality sector during the busy Christmas period. Previous industrial action on the network resulted in a 41% drop in usage, with entire lines being closed. Officials urge both parties to reach an urgent agreement to avoid further damage to London's economy. ## Technological and Structural Shifts The proposed changes include moving from paper-based to electronic systems for booking on duty. Management insists these updates will deliver a more efficient and reliable service for customers. However, the RMT remains skeptical, pointing to initial rosters for the Bakerloo line as evidence of potential significant reductions in overall staffing levels. ## Future Outlook Uncertain With the RMT rejecting current proposals and Aslef supporting the voluntary shift, the workforce remains divided. The strikes are set to continue into early 2027 unless a resolution is reached. Commuters and visitors should prepare for significant travel disruption as both sides remain locked in a dispute over fundamental working conditions. ## Sources covering this story - [BBC News – England — London Tube Drivers Announce Series of Christmas Strikes](https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ck7vpplgvrjqo?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss) - [BBC News – UK — London Underground Drivers Plan Christmas Strike Over Working Hours](https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ck7vpplgvrjqo?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss) - [The Independent – UK — London Underground Drivers Plan Series of 24-Hour Strikes](https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/london-underground-tube-drivers-strike-rmt-b3080382.html) - [Evening Standard — RMT Announces Eight 24-Hour Tube Strikes Across London](https://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/tube-strikes-london-underground-rmt-b1303820.html) --- _Summary written by Brifing from the original reporting. Copyright in the original article belongs to its publisher; read the full piece at the link above._