Geopolitics and Collaboration in Research Innovation
New study examines how political tensions reshape global research networks.
1Impact of geopolitical tensions on research
The 2026 Research Policy study reveals geopolitical factors increasingly determine international research collaborations. The US-China tech rivalry caused a 17% drop in co-authored scientific papers. Meanwhile, EU's Horizon program continues supporting multinational projects despite political tensions. The analysis examined authorship networks across 2.3 million papers from 2010-2025.
2National collaboration patterns
Research shows countries shape collaboration networks based on scientific priorities. Technology-driven economies like Germany and Japan maintain partnerships in high-budget basic research. Developing nations create alternative channels through China's Belt Road initiative. Turkey increased international co-publications by 34% in five years.
3Scientific consequences of political divides
Western universities suspending projects with Russian researchers after Ukraine invasion caused major disruptions in space and nuclear research. Nature data shows citations for Russia-based papers dropped 41% from 2022-2025. However, countries like India and Brazil maintain scientific ties while avoiding political positions.
4AI research competition
In generative AI, 73% of US company papers have single-country authorship compared to China's 82%. Organizations like OpenAI restrict data sharing with certain nations due to ethical concerns. The study found 68% of machine learning patent applications remain within national borders.
5Alternative collaboration models
Multinational science organizations like CERN and ITER maintain cooperation despite tensions. Africa Union's university network increased intercontinental publications by 29% in 2025. Researchers note UNESCO's Open Science recommendations could provide new frameworks for global collaboration.
6Private sector's role
Microsoft Research and Google Brain create cross-border research networks. In 2025, privately funded international projects generated 23% more patents than public ones. However, trade secrets and national security concerns hinder collaboration in quantum and biotech fields.
7Early-career researchers' perspective
64% of researchers under 35 report political tensions negatively impact careers. Applications for exchange programs like Erasmus+ and Fulbright dropped 18% in three years. Yet digital collaboration platform usage grew 112%. Younger scientists build informal networks through tools like Slack and ResearchGate.
8Future of science diplomacy
The study emphasizes scientific collaboration's critical role in solving global challenges. Climate change and pandemics require transnational cooperation. Experts recommend strengthening supranational science organizations. Open science initiatives could increase research productivity by 37% by 2030.
Original article: Research Policy — Araştırma ve İnovasyonda Jeopolitik İşbirliği