# Matt Mullenweg Regains Control of Automattic Amid Board Dispute

Founder reclaims leadership after brief board disagreement and CFO's deactivation.

- **Source:** [Slashdot](https://brifing.si/source/0f34d58e-1ccd-45a6-ab82-2de4065dc7ad)
- **Published:** 2026-09-12
- **Topic:** [Leadership](https://brifing.si/c/leadership)
- **Original article:** <https://slashdot.org/story/26/09/12/1751208/automattics-matt-mullenweg-claims-hes-back-in-control?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&utm_medium=feed>
- **On Brifing:** https://brifing.si/s/4e7ee4dd-80d7-470e-b213-b03250fbf637

## Sudden Leadership Shift

Automattic's board placed founder Matt Mullenweg on leave, only for him to announce his return to control within 48 hours. The abrupt reversal occurred after apparent disagreements among board members. Mullenweg signaled his return with a playful LL Cool J reference in Slack, while wearing a pirate-themed profile picture. CFO Mark Davies, who was set to serve as interim CEO, had his Slack account deactivated during this period.

## Cryptic Corporate Communications

Mullenweg communicated his return through Slack's company-wide Announcements channel, calling it a 'misunderstanding.' He expressed respect for those involved but provided no specifics about the board disagreement. Meanwhile, Automattic's leadership page still listed Mullenweg as CEO throughout the incident. The company has not officially commented on Davies' account deactivation or the nature of the dispute.

## Parallel Personal Announcement

Amid the corporate drama, Mullenweg published a personal blog post about buying a tugboat, avoiding any mention of the Automattic situation. He philosophized about founder stewardship, writing that 'no one will love a thing quite like the original owner.' This followed his promise to TechCrunch about an upcoming blog post, which turned out to be unrelated to the leadership controversy.

## Historical Context of Tensions

This incident continues a pattern of turbulence under Mullenweg's leadership. Automattic has faced multiple rounds of layoffs, including 100 employees in 2023. The company also saw high-profile departures like former WordPress.com lead Dave Martin. These events follow Mullenweg's 2021 return as CEO after stepping back in 2014, a move that initially caused internal confusion.

## Board Dynamics Scrutinized

Automattic's board includes notable figures like Toni Schneider (former Automattic CEO) and Om Malik (venture capitalist). The recent disagreement marks rare public visibility into their governance. Mullenweg owns about 40% of Automattic, giving him significant control despite board oversight. The company was valued at $7.5 billion in its last funding round.

## Industry Leadership Patterns

Founder-CEO disputes are common in tech, with examples like Twitter's Jack Dorsey and Uber's Travis Kalanick. Mullenweg's situation mirrors these cases where visionary founders clash with governance structures. Automattic's distributed workforce of 2,000+ employees across 96 countries adds complexity to leadership transitions compared to traditional corporate structures.

## Communication Culture Impact

The use of Slack for major announcements reflects Automattic's remote-first culture. However, the platform's informality may contribute to mixed messages during crises. Employees reported confusion during the 48-hour period, with leadership changes communicated through cryptic pop culture references rather than formal statements.

## Future Governance Implications

This episode raises questions about Automattic's succession planning as it matures beyond startup phase. With WordPress powering 43% of websites, leadership stability impacts the broader web ecosystem. Mullenweg's tugboat metaphor suggests he sees himself as Automattic's permanent steward, potentially limiting future leadership transitions.

## Sources covering this story

- https://slashdot.org/story/26/09/12/1751208/automattics-matt-mullenweg-claims-hes-back-in-control?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&utm_medium=feed — 

---

_Summary written by Brifing from the original reporting. Copyright in the original article belongs to its publisher; read the full piece at the link above._
