# NewJeans Members Challenge K-Pop Industry's Restrictive Contract Practices Leaked contracts reveal extreme control over young artists' personal lives and artistic freedom. - **Source:** [Folha de S.Paulo](https://www.folha.uol.com.br) - **Published:** 2026-11-08 - **Topic:** [Business](https://brifing.si/c/business) - **Original article:** - **On Brifing:** https://brifing.si/s/510a8fbb-5470-4872-9587-9390b49ac15f ## Unprecedented Industry Rebellion The K-pop girl group NewJeans made history by attempting to leave their label, Ador, a subsidiary of the entertainment giant Hybe. This move, rare for artists of their stature, sparked a major legal and power struggle. The members cited psychological suffering as the primary reason for their decision to terminate their contracts. ## Hidden Contractual Clauses Leaked documents reveal that the members signed agreements between ages 14 and 17 that were highly restrictive. These contracts omitted government-recommended protections regarding physical and mental health, education, and sleep. Instead, they imposed strict behavioral codes, prohibiting actions deemed insincere or damaging to the label's reputation, effectively controlling the artists' personal lives. ## Aggressive Control Mechanisms The contracts granted the label rights to use the members' voices via artificial intelligence indefinitely, even after the agreement ended. Furthermore, the label included heavy termination penalties and clauses that allowed them to continue selling the group's music while drastically reducing payments. Experts describe these terms as exceptionally aggressive and restrictive. ## Systemic Exploitation Concerns The K-pop industry frequently recruits children, subjecting them to years of intense training. Many artists face significant debt, known as trainee debt, to cover these costs. While NewJeans avoided this specific debt, the broader industry culture remains under scrutiny for reports of starvation diets and the lack of basic human rights protections. ## Label's Legal Defense Hybe maintains that its contracts are legal and negotiated in good faith to protect both the artists and the company's financial investments. The company stated that government guidelines are non-binding and that the terms were accepted by the members' parents. They emphasize their commitment to providing safe training and work environments. ## Comparison to Western Standards Industry experts note that while contract disputes are common in music, the level of control in K-pop is unique. In the United States, artists typically hire their own managers and agents, retaining more control over their careers. In South Korea, labels act as record companies, managers, and agents, controlling every professional aspect. ## Training Environment Realities Reports indicate that NewJeans members lived in dorms starting as young as age 12, with rehearsals often lasting until 2:00 AM. Training areas were monitored by video cameras, and taking breaks was reportedly discouraged. Four of the five members dropped out of school during their intensive training period to focus on the group. ## Aesthetic and Financial Pressures The contracts required members to partially reimburse the label for beauty expenses, including plastic surgery. While Hybe claims they do not force procedures, industry insiders suggest that such recommendations are often interpreted as requirements. This practice contributes to the financial entanglements that bind young artists to their labels for many years. ## Vague Behavioral Restrictions The agreements prohibited 'insincere attitudes' and 'inappropriate romantic relationships,' terms so vague that they provided the label with broad grounds for contract termination. Members were also forbidden from criticizing the company, even if the claims were true, effectively silencing them regarding their working conditions or internal disputes within the management. ## Public Confrontation and Testimony In October 2024, member Hanni Pham testified before the South Korean Parliament, alleging that Ador staff insulted the group and minimized their success. This public testimony directly challenged the non-disclosure clauses in their contracts. The members' subsequent decision to hold a press conference signaled a total breakdown in their relationship with management. ## Industry-Wide Implications The NewJeans case has sent shockwaves through the multibillion-dollar K-pop industry. Executives fear that if the group successfully breaks their contracts, it could set a precedent that destabilizes the current business model. The dispute highlights a growing tension between the industry's rigid control and the evolving demands for artist freedom. ## Future of Artist Rights The controversy underscores the limitations of current government interventions in the entertainment sector. Despite promises of reform, the NewJeans contracts prove that little has changed for even the most successful stars. The outcome of this legal battle will likely determine whether future K-pop idols gain better protections and personal autonomy. ## Sources covering this story - https://redir.folha.com.br/redir/online/emcimadahora/rss091/*https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/ilustrada/2026/11/grupo-de-k-pop-feminino-revela-acordos-bizarros-e-controle-de-gravadora.shtml — --- _Summary written by Brifing from the original reporting. Copyright in the original article belongs to its publisher; read the full piece at the link above._