# Rivals Season 2 Part 2 Review: A Taggie Problem Emerges

Disney+ series struggles as central romance dampens the show's chaotic, high-stakes energy.

- **Source:** [The Independent – Culture](https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment)
- **Published:** 2026-11-09
- **Topic:** [entertainment](https://brifing.si/c/entertainment)
- **Original article:** <https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/tv/reviews/rivals-disney-review-part-2-b3080584.html>
- **On Brifing:** https://brifing.si/s/559947be-0654-44e7-beee-ac28a4dd55e9

## Return of the Rutshire Drama

Disney+ series Rivals returns with six final episodes to conclude its second season. The narrative follows the aftermath of Monica Baddingham’s death, which triggers widespread chaos across the estate. As extramarital affairs and professional rivalries intensify, the show attempts to balance its signature high-class soap opera tone with darker, more complex character arcs.

## Complex Web of Intrigue

The plot juggles multiple storylines, including the crumbling marriage of Declan and Maud O’Hara alongside the illicit affair between Lizzie and Freddie. Meanwhile, a mysterious mole within the Venturer camp threatens their franchise bid. These interconnected threads maintain the show's reputation for being a saucy, biting satire of 1980s Thatcherite British culture.

## The Narrative Pragmatism Approach

Characters like Cameron Cook demonstrate the show's utilitarian approach to storytelling, shifting between romantic interests as the plot demands. While the series excels at social commentary and sexual intrigue, this flexibility sometimes makes character motivations feel secondary to the immediate needs of the script, prioritizing rapid plot progression over deep, consistent personal development.

## The Taggie O'Hara Problem

Taggie O’Hara, intended as the romantic lead, is criticized for being monochrome compared to the vibrant supporting cast. Her character traits are largely limited to being dyslexic and making canapés, which fails to provide a compelling foil for the wild Rupert Campbell-Black. This pairing has unfortunately neutered the show's most entertaining character.

## Depth Versus Forced Romance

While the show forces a slow-burn romance between Rupert and Taggie, other storylines offer significantly more emotional weight. The depiction of Gerald and Muffy’s marriage, shadowed by the AIDS crisis, provides a level of pathos that the central “will they, won’t they” dynamic lacks. These subplots highlight the show's untapped potential for serious drama.

## Structural Issues in Distribution

The decision to split the second season into two distinct parts appears driven by the streaming platform's financial model rather than creative necessity. With a six-month gap between the two halves, the episodes feel disconnected. This strategy, likely intended to maintain subscription levels, disrupts the narrative momentum of the otherwise fast-paced, jolly romp.

## Character Compromise and Fun

The show’s greatest strength remains its collection of morally questionable and flawed individuals. When characters are fully compromised, the audience engagement is at its peak. However, by focusing too heavily on the sanitized central romance, the series risks losing the chaotic, biting energy that made the initial episodes of Jilly Cooper’s adaptation successful.

## Future of the Franchise

Rivals remains an accomplished depiction of 1980s Sloane Ranger culture, despite its recent narrative missteps. To maintain its appeal, the show must refocus on its more complex, morally ambiguous characters rather than conventional romantic tropes. The future success of the series depends on balancing its satirical bite with more meaningful, less predictable character arcs.

## Sources covering this story

- https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/tv/reviews/rivals-disney-review-part-2-b3080584.html — 

---

_Summary written by Brifing from the original reporting. Copyright in the original article belongs to its publisher; read the full piece at the link above._
