# Constitutional Crisis Deepens as Judges Clash Over Tribunal Leadership Legal experts debate the legitimacy of recent actions taken within Poland's Constitutional Tribunal. - **Source:** [TVN24](https://tvn24.pl) - **Published:** 2026-11-05 - **Topic:** [politics](https://brifing.si/c/politics) - **Original article:** - **On Brifing:** https://brifing.si/s/57b4ed90-d178-4991-9f8f-c52988b70926 ## Tribunal Leadership Conflict The crisis escalated on October 30 when Judge Anna Korwin-Piotrowska assumed control of the Constitutional Tribunal. She issued an order suspending President Bogdan Święczkowski and Vice President Bartłomiej Sochański from their duties. This move triggered intense protests outside the building and prompted President Karol Nawrocki to cut short his Senegal visit. ## Controversial Quorum Calculation Eight judges convened a General Assembly on Tuesday to address the leadership vacuum. They determined that the statutory quorum of two-thirds should be calculated based on 12 active judges, rather than the full 15. This calculation excluded the two suspended officials and Jarosław Wyrembak, who refused to participate due to procedural objections. ## Risks of Legal Precedents Professor Marcin Matczak warned that the current interpretation of law creates dangerous precedents. He argued that if the current majority suspends officials based on broad discretionary powers, future administrations could use the same mechanism to purge any judge. He emphasized that such actions threaten the long-term neutrality and stability of the institution. ## The Need for Neutrality Matczak compared the politicized tribunal to a sports league where referees are biased toward one team. He argued that the goal of the Constitutional Tribunal must be universal recognition by all political sides. He expressed skepticism that the current events would lead to a truly apolitical body capable of impartial arbitration. ## View on Institutional Rebuilding Professor Michał Romanowski offered a contrasting perspective, describing the current situation as a difficult but necessary beginning of institutional reconstruction. He noted that the Polish justice system has suffered significant degradation since 2015. For him, the recent actions represent a vital step toward restoring the rule of law within the country. ## Trust in Judicial Figures Romanowski defended the integrity of the judges involved in the recent assembly, including Anna Korwin-Piotrowska and Krystian Markiewicz. He argued that these individuals have a proven track record of defending the rule of law, which justifies granting them a degree of public trust during this volatile period of transition and institutional reform. ## Systemic Backlog and Dysfunction The tribunal has faced severe operational issues, with approximately 700 cases left unprocessed and nearly 1,200 cases remaining unrecognized in recent years. Romanowski attributed this dysfunction to those who have systematically dismantled the judiciary since 2015. He believes these same actors are now actively obstructing efforts to restore the court's functionality. ## Future Outlook and Stability While Romanowski sees a glimmer of hope, the path forward remains legally precarious. The conflict highlights a deep divide in constitutional interpretation regarding quorum requirements and executive authority. Observers are now watching to see if these judicial actions will be recognized as legitimate or if they will trigger further institutional paralysis. ## Sources covering this story - https://tvn24.pl/polska/marcin-matczak-i-michal-romanowski-w-tak-jest-debata-nad-rola-trybunalu-konstytucyjnego-oraz-obowiazkow-sedziow-st9324946?source=rss — --- _Summary written by Brifing from the original reporting. Copyright in the original article belongs to its publisher; read the full piece at the link above._