# Trump's Attempted USPS Power Grab Over Mail-in Voting

Revealed plans show unprecedented federal interference in election logistics through postal service mandates.

- **Source:** [Gizmodo](https://gizmodo.com/)
- **Published:** 2026-09-29
- **Original article:** <https://gizmodo.com/trump-wanted-to-force-postal-workers-to-conduct-identity-checks-on-mail-in-voters-2000818575>
- **On Brifing:** https://brifing.si/s/5db4e15e-9ba6-4d6f-82c5-727f8dd52c15

## Executive overreach attempt

The Trump administration's March 2026 executive order sought to transform the USPS into an election enforcement arm, requiring special ballot envelopes and pre-approval of designs from nearly 10,000 voting jurisdictions. This would have created a federal bureaucracy for mail-in ballots under White House control, with the Postal Service forced to coordinate with DHS and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. The order demoted the postmaster general's role to simply implementing these directives.

## Certified mail requirement

Initial White House demands went further - requiring ballots be delivered as Certified Mail, necessitating in-person ID checks and signatures from recipients. This would have effectively created a national voter ID requirement through postal workers. The USPS convinced Trump this was logistically impossible, given 48 million mail-in votes in 2024. Certified mail costs $5.55 per item, with costs potentially pushed to local governments.

## Bulk rejection mechanism

Trump's order included a provision requiring entire batches of ballots to be returned if any single envelope contained errors. A former official noted this meant if just four addresses had issues in a million-ballot mailing, 999,996 valid ballots wouldn't be delivered. The USPS Board of Governors feared resisting these measures due to Trump's history of firing officials from independent agencies.

## Parallel voter purge efforts

While SCOTUS blocked the USPS order, it allowed another Trump initiative on September 25 - letting DHS use federal databases to search voter rolls for alleged non-citizens. Advocacy groups argue these systems contain numerous errors. Federal law prohibits systematic voter removals within 90 days of elections, but Republicans claim targeting 'non-citizens' constitutes individualized action.

## Election security pretext

The administration framed these measures as election security improvements despite no evidence of meaningful mail-in voter fraud. A PBS/NPR/Marist poll shows only Trump's base believes fraud claims, though 40% of both parties doubt election mail will arrive on time. The White House continued pushing measures guaranteed to cause confusion and delays as Election Day approached.

## USPS institutional pressure

Postal Service leadership faced unprecedented political pressure, with one source noting resistance might be their 'last action' given Trump's willingness to fire officials. The Supreme Court's recent expansion of presidential power over independent agencies added to these concerns. Instead of direct opposition, USPS leadership reportedly waited for judicial intervention.

## Legal strategy parallels

The administration's approach followed a pattern of using novel legal arguments to circumvent election protections. Alongside the USPS orders, they claimed targeting alleged non-citizens constituted 'individualized' action exempt from rules against systematic voter purges. This reflects broader efforts to exploit technicalities in election administration laws.

## Democratic process implications

These revelations highlight how election infrastructure became a battleground, with the Postal Service nearly weaponized for partisan advantage. The attempted transformation of a neutral mail delivery system into an election enforcement mechanism represents an unprecedented challenge to traditional separations between administration and politics in democratic processes.

## Sources covering this story

- https://gizmodo.com/trump-wanted-to-force-postal-workers-to-conduct-identity-checks-on-mail-in-voters-2000818575 — 

---

_Summary written by Brifing from the original reporting. Copyright in the original article belongs to its publisher; read the full piece at the link above._
