# Decade-Long Dispute Over Russian-Occupied Lidingö Property Ends The final tenants have vacated the Lidingö high-rise, concluding a ten-year legal standoff. - **Source:** [SVT Nyheter](https://www.svt.se/nyheter) - **Published:** 2026-11-06 - **Topic:** [politics](https://brifing.si/c/politics) - **Original article:** - **On Brifing:** https://brifing.si/s/6362ed00-6d41-4ffc-84df-f9778a972852 ## The Lidingö Property Evacuation The decade-long conflict surrounding the high-rise building on Lidingö, commonly known as the Russian house, has finally concluded. The last remaining tenants have officially vacated the premises, allowing the property owner, Stefan Häge, to enter the building for the first time since his company acquired it at an executive auction in 2014. ## A Decade of Legal Stagnation After purchasing the property in 2014, Stefan Häge faced a persistent refusal from the Russian tenants to either pay rent or vacate the premises. This stalemate triggered a ten-year legal battle, during which the owner repeatedly criticized the Swedish state for its perceived inaction and failure to support his property rights against foreign occupants. ## Allegations of Intelligence Activity The situation gained significant public attention three years ago when reports suggested the building was being utilized by individuals identified as Russian intelligence officers. These individuals allegedly operated under the cover of diplomatic status, complicating the legal eviction process and raising concerns regarding national security implications within the Swedish residential area of Lidingö. ## Ministry for Foreign Affairs Stance The Swedish Ministry for Foreign Affairs has consistently defended its hands-off approach by citing the Vienna Convention. The ministry maintains that diplomatic residences must be protected from intrusion to ensure the dignity of foreign representatives. They argue that this adherence to international law is essential for the reciprocal treatment of Swedish diplomats abroad. ## Government Defense of Protocol Former Foreign Minister Tobias Billström addressed the criticism in 2023, emphasizing that the government was bound by international obligations. He stated that the state had to ensure the individuals residing there were treated with dignity, framing the issue as a matter of mutual diplomatic exchange rather than a simple landlord-tenant dispute. ## Owner Criticism of State Inaction Stefan Häge has expressed deep frustration with the Swedish government, claiming they provided no assistance throughout the ten-year ordeal. He explicitly stated that he owes no gratitude to the state for the resolution, asserting that he had to rely entirely on his own efforts to eventually regain control of his private property. ## Ministry Policy on Diplomatic Housing The Ministry for Foreign Affairs clarified that it does not maintain a formal register of all diplomatic residences. Furthermore, the ministry declined to comment on whether it participated in any direct negotiations regarding the property's fate, stating only that all actions were taken in accordance with Sweden's specific international legal obligations and commitments. ## Implications of the Resolution The departure of the tenants marks the end of a complex case that tested the limits of property rights against diplomatic immunity. While the physical occupation has ended, the case remains a notable example of the friction between domestic legal enforcement and the protections afforded by the Vienna Convention in modern diplomatic relations. ## Sources covering this story - https://www.svt.se/nyheter/inrikes/ud-om-sitt-agerande-kring-ryska-huset-ska-skyddas — --- _Summary written by Brifing from the original reporting. Copyright in the original article belongs to its publisher; read the full piece at the link above._