# Chancellor Friedrich Merz Cancels Attendance at UN Climate Summit in Antalya German Chancellor Friedrich Merz faces backlash for skipping the upcoming UN climate conference in Turkey. - **Source:** [Der Spiegel – Politik](https://www.spiegel.de/politik) - **Published:** 2026-11-04 - **Topic:** [politics](https://brifing.si/c/politics) - **Original article:** - **On Brifing:** https://brifing.si/s/676578f8-ff40-4d0b-8a7b-e5b1ab2146a5 ## Summit Absence Confirmed Chancellor Friedrich Merz will not attend the UN climate summit in Antalya, scheduled from November 9 to November 20, 2026. A government spokesperson cited other obligations as the reason for his absence. This decision marks a departure from his personal attendance at the previous COP 30 summit held in Brazil last year. ## Political Backlash Intensifies The Green Party has sharply criticized the move, with faction leader Katharina Dröge calling it a devastating signal to the global community. Critics argue that the Chancellor is failing to provide necessary leadership, especially following the United States' withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, which requires clear commitment from major European political figures. ## Activists Label Decision Taboo Climate activists, including Luisa Neubauer of Fridays for Future, have described the Chancellor's absence as an absolute breach of protocol. They argue that in a year marked by record heat and environmental disasters across Europe, the government’s decision to stay away projects a sleepy and indifferent image on the international diplomatic stage. ## Heatwave Mortality Concerns Greenpeace Germany board member Martin Kaiser highlighted the lack of political reaction to the more than 15,000 heat-related deaths recorded this summer. While some sources report 15,000 and others mention 16,000, critics emphasize that the government has failed to address the urgency of these climate-driven tragedies with sufficient policy changes or personal engagement. ## Missed Climate Targets Germany is currently failing to meet its established climate protection goals for both 2030 and 2040, according to the independent expert council for climate issues. Critics argue that Merz should have used the Antalya platform to announce a fundamental shift in policy to correct this trajectory, rather than avoiding the international forum. ## Financial Commitment Disputes Tensions remain high regarding international climate financing. While the government promised significant contributions to the Global South at the previous summit, reports indicate that actual climate funding has been reduced. In 2025, Germany provided 4.7 billion euros for climate protection, falling short of the previously discussed 6-billion-euro commitment target. ## Ideological Policy Debates The Chancellor faces accusations of maintaining a 20th-century approach to economic policy, prioritizing fossil-fuel-based systems over low-emission alternatives. Critics suggest that his refusal to attend the summit aligns with a broader trend of weakening climate regulations, such as recent debates surrounding the potential reversal of the European combustion engine phase-out. ## Future Political Implications The decision to skip the summit reflects a deepening divide between the current administration and climate advocates. As the government continues to navigate domestic pressures, including sugar tax negotiations and support for Ukraine, the absence from Antalya is viewed by opponents as a significant loss of political influence and future-oriented leadership. ## Sources covering this story - [Der Spiegel – Politik — Chancellor Friedrich Merz Cancels Attendance at UN Climate Summit in Antalya](https://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/friedrich-merz-reist-nicht-zur-klimakonferenz-gruene-kritisieren-kanzler-als-enttaeuschung-in-sachen-klimaschutz-a-e04d8fa6-5790-4e2a-aea7-800aa4626e5d#ref=rss) - [taz — Chancellor Merz Skips UN Climate Summit in Antalya](https://taz.de/UN-Klimakonferenz-in-Antalya/!6227704/) --- _Summary written by Brifing from the original reporting. Copyright in the original article belongs to its publisher; read the full piece at the link above._