# Comparing British and American Bureaucratic Resistance Michael Lewis explores how government workers resist structural changes within state institutions. - **Source:** [New Statesman](https://www.newstatesman.com) - **Published:** 2026-11-05 - **Topic:** [politics](https://brifing.si/c/politics) - **Original article:** - **On Brifing:** https://brifing.si/s/6d2802a7-9885-4728-af7f-76c756d00a62 ## Investigating Institutional Resistance Author Michael Lewis recently discussed his latest book, Blockers, during a podcast appearance at the New Statesman studio. The work serves as an investigation into how specific government employees actively resisted the Department of Government Efficiency, often referred to as Doge. This analysis highlights the internal friction within modern administrative structures. ## The Human Element Lewis describes misguided young men sleeping on office floors as part of his research into bureaucratic defiance. These individuals represent the front lines of a clash between political mandates and established institutional norms. The account emphasizes the personal toll and physical presence required to maintain resistance against top-down government efficiency initiatives. ## Security and Symbolic Victories The narrative includes a security guard who achieved pyrrhic victories while attempting to prevent access to his institute’s building. Such moments illustrate the granular nature of resistance, where small, tactical successes are prioritized over broader strategic outcomes. These struggles reflect the deep-seated tension between workers and the evolving mandates of state. ## The Significance of Tax Records While the physical struggles of workers are notable, Lewis identifies the chapter concerning tax records as the most impactful element of his investigation. This focus suggests that the true battleground for government efficiency lies within the management and accessibility of sensitive data. Controlling information remains a critical lever for institutional power. ## Comparative Administrative Systems The discussion draws a parallel between the American experience and the British deportation system, questioning which framework is more problematic. By contrasting these two distinct national systems, the analysis seeks to understand how different legal and cultural environments shape the effectiveness of government policy implementation and the resulting public administrative outcomes. ## Structural Efficiency Challenges The Department of Government Efficiency represents a significant attempt to overhaul traditional state operations. Resistance from within suggests that structural change is rarely a purely technical process. Instead, it involves navigating complex human networks and established hierarchies that often prioritize continuity over the rapid implementation of new political directives or goals. ## Bureaucratic Autonomy Dynamics The resistance documented by Lewis highlights the inherent autonomy of government workers when faced with radical shifts in leadership. This phenomenon is not unique to one country, as the comparison to British systems implies. Understanding this dynamic is essential for any government attempting to execute large-scale reforms within entrenched public sector organizations. ## Implications for Future Reform The findings in Blockers suggest that future reform efforts must account for the deep-seated resistance of career civil servants. Whether in the United States or Britain, the ability to manage institutional friction determines the success of efficiency drives. Policymakers should anticipate these human barriers when planning significant changes to national administrative frameworks. ## Sources covering this story - https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/left-hook/2026/11/why-britains-deportation-system-could-be-worse-than-americas — --- _Summary written by Brifing from the original reporting. Copyright in the original article belongs to its publisher; read the full piece at the link above._