# Global Safeguards Needed to Assess Health Risks of Novel Chemicals Experts demand stricter chemical regulations as synthetic pollutants and CO2 levels threaten human health. - **Source:** [Eco-Business](https://www.eco-business.com) - **Published:** 2026-11-05 - **Topic:** [health](https://brifing.si/c/health) - **Original article:** - **On Brifing:** https://brifing.si/s/6f90ef7c-2908-44d5-a12b-2ee2717d3d57 ## Unregulated Chemical Proliferation Humanity has introduced roughly 350,000 synthetic chemicals into global markets since 2020. Despite this massive volume, health data exists for only a small fraction of these substances. Many chemical compositions remain protected as proprietary trade secrets, preventing independent researchers from assessing their long-term toxicity or potential impacts on human biological systems. ## The Plastic Health Crisis Plastics contain over 16,000 additives, with approximately one-quarter identified as potentially hazardous to human health. These chemicals leach into the environment and human bodies, causing systemic damage. Recent meta-analyses link these substances to increased risks of cancer, obesity, type 2 diabetes, and significant harm to cardiovascular and immune systems. ## Microplastics and Internal Exposure Micro- and nano-plastics infiltrate the body through food and air, crossing critical barriers like the placenta and the blood-brain barrier. This lifelong exposure impacts fertility and development across all life stages. Because these particles travel throughout the body, they potentially affect every organ system, necessitating urgent, ongoing research into their cumulative effects. ## PFAS and Early Vulnerability PFAS, or forever chemicals, are pervasive in food packaging and cookware, showing clear links to inflammatory bowel disease. A 2026 study detected these chemicals in pregnant women and newborns, correlating higher prenatal exposure with increased calprotectin levels. This protein serves as a marker for intestinal inflammation, suggesting long-term gastrointestinal health risks. ## Atmospheric CO2 Health Impacts Atmospheric carbon dioxide levels have risen from 280 ppm in pre-industrial times to 429 ppm in 2026. While studied as a greenhouse gas, its physiological impact on humans inhaling these concentrations remains largely unknown. Preliminary research suggests that chronic exposure might alter blood acidity and bicarbonate levels, potentially affecting human physiology over time. ## Physiological Changes in Mice Preliminary studies by Alexander Larcombe exposed mice to 890 ppm of CO2 during early life stages. The results indicated significant changes to lung structure, function, and altered growth patterns. While these findings do not confirm identical human outcomes, they highlight a critical blind spot regarding the biological consequences of elevated atmospheric CO2. ## Human Blood Bicarbonate Trends Researchers analyzing US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data found that human blood bicarbonate levels rose steadily between 1999 and 2020. This trend tracks closely with increasing atmospheric CO2 concentrations. If these current patterns persist, bicarbonate levels could reach the upper limit of the accepted healthy range within the next fifty years. ## Limitations of Current Frameworks The planetary boundaries framework identifies safe thresholds for Earth system stability but fails to account for human health. Experts argue that current limits do not protect individual biological integrity. A new planetary health framework is proposed to track specific human biomarkers, helping policymakers understand when environmental conditions exceed our evolutionary limits. ## Regulatory Failures and Loopholes Unlike the pharmaceutical industry, which requires rigorous clinical trials, the chemical industry faces minimal safety testing requirements. US regulations like the Toxic Substances Control Act remain ineffective due to underfunding and industry loopholes. Meanwhile, the European Union's REACH regulation has banned hundreds of substances, but global enforcement remains inconsistent and fragmented. ## Global Inequality in Exposure When G7 nations ban harmful chemicals, manufacturers often continue exporting and marketing these products to countries with weaker regulatory oversight. This practice reinforces existing global health inequalities. Experts emphasize that the current system of rushing synthetics to market while asking questions about toxicity later is fundamentally unsustainable and poses severe risks. ## Future Policy and Monitoring The United Nations Environment Programme adopted the Global Framework on Chemicals in 2023 to manage synthetic substances. An upcoming international conference in Geneva aims to identify implementation priorities. Success depends on establishing binding safety limits and securing research funding to address the current knowledge gap regarding lifetime exposure to environmental pollutants. ## Sources covering this story - https://www.eco-business.com/news/global-safeguards-needed-to-assess-health-risks-of-novel-chemicals-experts/ — --- _Summary written by Brifing from the original reporting. Copyright in the original article belongs to its publisher; read the full piece at the link above._