# Tech Industry Adopts 'Super Intelligence' Following Executive Branch Mandate

Major tech CEOs shift terminology to align with new federal executive directives.

- **Source:** [Slashdot](https://brifing.si/source/0f34d58e-1ccd-45a6-ab82-2de4065dc7ad)
- **Published:** 2026-11-01
- **Topic:** [Business](https://brifing.si/c/business)
- **Original article:** <https://tech.slashdot.org/story/26/10/31/0615204/which-tech-companies-started-using-trumps-phrase-super-intelligence?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&utm_medium=feed>
- **On Brifing:** https://brifing.si/s/755d11ec-80d0-4a02-a6b6-61c4d020cdbc

## Executive Mandate Triggers Shift

President Donald Trump recently ordered federal agencies to replace the term artificial intelligence with super intelligence. This directive has begun influencing corporate communications across the technology sector. While some executives have quickly adopted the new terminology during official earnings calls, others continue to utilize traditional industry standard language in their public reporting.

## Musk and Zuckerberg Align

Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg have emerged as early adopters of the new terminology. Musk rebranded his rocket company division to SpaceXSI and referenced SI during Tesla earnings calls. Meanwhile, Zuckerberg emphasized Meta's goal of delivering personal superintelligence, noting that the company had already established a dedicated lab unit for this specific field.

## Resistance Among Tech Giants

Several major tech leaders remain committed to the term artificial intelligence despite the executive pressure. Amazon CEO Andy Jassy used the abbreviation AI over a dozen times during his recent introductory remarks. Similarly, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai continue to prioritize AI in their strategic discussions and quarterly earnings commentary.

## Microsoft's Mixed Messaging

Microsoft exhibits a complex approach to the new terminology. While CEO Satya Nadella frequently uses AI in public speaking engagements, the company's annual report filed last week explicitly included eight mentions of super intelligence. This inclusion begins at the very top of the letter to shareholders, signaling a formal shift in documentation.

## Industry-Wide Linguistic Adoption

The shift is extending beyond consumer-facing platforms into hardware and infrastructure sectors. Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan attributed current chip supply shortages to unprecedented demand for super intelligence. Additionally, IBM CEO Arvind Krishna has begun using SI alongside AI during earnings calls, reflecting a broader trend of linguistic integration across diverse segments of technology.

## Public Support from Executives

Certain industry leaders have expressed explicit support for the terminology change on social media platforms. Palo Alto Networks CEO Nikesh Arora described a White House meeting on SI as an epic moment. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang also took to X to publicly praise the White House Accord on Super Intelligence following last month's meeting.

## Strategic Implications for Firms

The adoption of super intelligence terminology appears linked to proximity to federal policy discussions. Executives who attended the September lunch at the White House are more likely to mirror the administration's language. This trend suggests that corporate vocabulary is becoming a tool for signaling alignment with current federal policy and executive branch priorities.

## Future Communication Standards

The tech industry remains divided on whether to fully transition to the new terminology. As more companies prepare for upcoming earnings reports next month, the divergence between those using SI and those sticking to AI will likely persist. Observers should monitor how these linguistic choices impact future government contracts and regulatory relations.

## Sources covering this story

- https://tech.slashdot.org/story/26/10/31/0615204/which-tech-companies-started-using-trumps-phrase-super-intelligence?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&utm_medium=feed — 

---

_Summary written by Brifing from the original reporting. Copyright in the original article belongs to its publisher; read the full piece at the link above._
