# Esteban Solari Rebuts Claims of Favoritism After Clásico Capitalino Draw

Pumas coach addresses refereeing controversies following a high-stakes 3-3 tie against América.

- **Source:** [El Universal – Nación](https://www.eluniversal.com.mx)
- **Published:** 2026-11-08
- **Topic:** [sports](https://brifing.si/c/sports)
- **Original article:** <https://www.eluniversal.com.mx/deportes/esteban-solari-responde-a-guillermo-almada-niega-que-pumas-fuera-beneficiado-en-el-clasico-capitalino/>
- **On Brifing:** https://brifing.si/s/78c5a8da-6175-4bce-b9ff-53fa8f20227f

## High Stakes Derby Draw

The 181st Clásico Capitalino between Pumas and América ended in a dramatic 3-3 draw at the Estadio Olímpico Universitario. Both teams failed to secure the three points necessary to advance their respective seasonal goals. Pumas sought a victory to boost Liguilla qualification chances, while América aimed to maintain their top position.

## Solari Reflects on Performance

Pumas manager Esteban Solari expressed dissatisfaction with the final result despite his team's second-half recovery. He admitted the squad did not start the match well but gained composure as minutes progressed. Solari emphasized that his team remains focused on securing a Liguilla spot as long as the mathematical possibilities still exist.

## Addressing Refereeing Allegations

Esteban Solari directly responded to criticisms voiced by Guillermo Almada regarding the officiating during the match. Almada had suggested that Pumas received favorable treatment from the referees. Solari firmly denied these claims, stating that his team has not been a beneficiary of refereeing decisions throughout the current year of competition.

## Specific Match Controversies

The Pumas coach highlighted several key moments that impacted the game's flow, including the disallowed goal for Robert Morales. He also pointed to a specific play where the referee called a foul instead of allowing an advantage. Solari argued that these instances demonstrate the lack of bias toward his own team.

## Almada's Counter-Arguments

Guillermo Almada had previously voiced frustration over specific calls, including a tight offside decision and a potential penalty involving Vite. He questioned the referee's logic regarding the sequence of events leading to a yellow card for Pedro. These complaints formed the basis of the tension between the two coaching staffs post-match.

## Focus on Future Qualification

Despite the frustration of dropping points, Solari remains committed to the team's objective of reaching the Liguilla. He praised the Pumas supporters for their magnificent encouragement throughout the intense 90 minutes. The focus now shifts to upcoming fixtures where every point will be critical for their final tournament standing.

## Tactical Analysis of Draw

The 3-3 scoreline reflects a defensive struggle for both sides during the 181st edition of this historic rivalry. While América looked to cement their lead, Pumas demonstrated resilience by overcoming a poor start. The tactical adjustments made by Solari at halftime were instrumental in keeping the team competitive until the final whistle.

## Context of Capitalino Rivalry

The Clásico Capitalino remains one of the most significant fixtures in Mexican football, often defined by high intensity and tactical friction. Disputes over officiating are common in such high-pressure environments, frequently overshadowing the actual gameplay. This match highlights the ongoing pressure managers face when balancing performance, results, and external perceptions.

## Sources covering this story

- https://www.eluniversal.com.mx/deportes/esteban-solari-responde-a-guillermo-almada-niega-que-pumas-fuera-beneficiado-en-el-clasico-capitalino/ — 

---

_Summary written by Brifing from the original reporting. Copyright in the original article belongs to its publisher; read the full piece at the link above._
