# SEC email address mix-up threatens quarterly reporting change Wrong email address caused incomplete public feedback submission. - **Source:** [Fortune | FORTUNE](https://brifing.si/source/769282ef-327a-4454-909a-3c7936216004) - **Published:** 2026-07-14 - **Topic:** [Finance](https://brifing.si/c/finance) - **Original article:** - **On Brifing:** https://brifing.si/s/7fb10004-0ed9-447e-b4f3-bd95adfd4f5e ## SEC's quarterly reporting proposal The SEC proposed a rule allowing public companies to report financial results twice a year instead of quarterly. This change aims to reduce reporting burdens. However, a mix-up in the feedback email address caused confusion during the public comment period. ## Email address confusion The SEC published the wrong email address for feedback submissions. 'rule-comment@sec.gov' was used instead of 'rule-comments@sec.gov'. This error prevented many investors from submitting their views. Better Markets, a nonprofit, alerted the SEC about this issue. ## Missing feedback Comments sent to the incorrect email address allegedly didn't appear on the SEC's website. Better Markets argued this undermined public participation and transparency. The SEC claimed both addresses were valid and all feedback would be considered. ## SEC's defense The SEC stated both email addresses were valid and all feedback would be reviewed. However, historical data shows the agency preferred the 'rule-comments' address in past proposals. This inconsistency raised questions about the SEC's credibility. ## Investor backlash Most published comments opposed the proposal. Retail investors, including Reddit's WallStreetBets community, emphasized quarterly reporting's importance. The change could create information asymmetry between institutional and individual investors. ## Legal implications Under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), the SEC must consider public feedback. Missing comments could weaken the proposal's legal standing. Better Markets suggested this error might lead to the rule's cancellation. How the SEC rectifies this remains unclear. ## Future of corporate transparency The SEC's proposal could reduce corporate transparency obligations. However, investors and advocacy groups strongly oppose it. The email mix-up highlighted the process's fragility. The SEC's next move will significantly impact the corporate finance landscape. ## Sources covering this story - https://fortune.com/2026/07/14/dispute-over-sec-comments-fuels-new-controversy-over-rule-to-scrap-quarterly-earnings/ — --- _Summary written by Brifing from the original reporting. Copyright in the original article belongs to its publisher; read the full piece at the link above._