Brifing

PTI Lawmaker Petitions FCC for Release of Detained KP Officials

Shandana Gulzar seeks judicial intervention for Sohail Afridi and other missing party leaders.

Dawn2 min

1Legal Challenge Filed

PTI lawmaker Shandana Gulzar has formally approached the Federal Constitutional Court seeking the immediate release of Sohail Afridi and other party workers. Afridi, the non-functional Khyber Pakhtunkhwa chief minister, has remained missing since October 11. This petition marks a significant escalation in the ongoing legal battle regarding recent detentions in Pakistan.

2Detention Under Emergency

The federal government imposed governor’s rule and a state of emergency in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa on October 11. A federal minister confirmed shortly thereafter that Afridi and several cabinet members were being held in preventive custody. The PTI maintains that Afridi continues to hold the chief minister position with party founder Imran Khan's support.

3Respondents Named in Petition

The petition names several high-ranking officials as respondents, including federal secretaries of interior and defence, the KP chief secretary, and the inspector general of police. It demands these authorities disclose the whereabouts of the detainees, the legal basis for their confinement, and the specific identity of the authority currently exercising custody.

4Constitutional Rights Arguments

Gulzar’s petition argues that state power exercised under Articles 232, 234, and 245 cannot bypass fundamental constitutional safeguards. It asserts that executive authority must not circumvent rights guaranteed under Articles 4, 9, 10, and 17. The filing seeks a judicial declaration that political motivations cannot justify the abuse of public authority.

5Access and Protection Demands

Beyond release, the petition requests the court to grant detainees immediate access to legal representation and family members. It also demands necessary medical examinations and protection against torture or coercion. The filing emphasizes that any detention must be subject to judicial review to ensure compliance with established constitutional and democratic legal standards.

6Previous Judicial Efforts

Afridi’s brother previously approached the Peshawar High Court on October 13 to trace his whereabouts, alleging abduction by masked individuals. While the high court initially handled such cases, the Federal Constitutional Court issued an order on November 5 restraining the high court from hearing matters concerning the detention of various PTI activists.

7Impact on High Court

Following the November 5 restraint order, the Peshawar High Court removed approximately 105 petitions from its November 10 cause lists. These included challenges to the imposition of emergency and the alleged illegal detention of party leadership. This judicial shift has effectively centralized the legal proceedings within the Federal Constitutional Court’s current jurisdiction.

8Broadening the Legal Scope

PTI Chairman Barrister Gohar Khan has also filed an application to intervene in the proceedings before the Federal Constitutional Court. He seeks to modify the November 5 order to allow the high court to resume hearing cases challenging the governor’s rule. This move aims to restore the original judicial path for these challenges.

Original article: Dawn — PTI Lawmaker Petitions FCC for Release of Detained KP Officials