Visualizing Laws: Adapting to the Post-Literate Era
US Congresswoman proposes adding images to legislation texts.
1The Idea of Visualized Laws
Democratic Congresswoman Marie Gluesenkamp Perez from Washington has initiated efforts to allow the inclusion of visuals like maps, blueprints, and diagrams in legislation texts. Perez argues this would make laws more understandable. In an August 2026 Twitter post, she raised the question, 'Why can't we add pictures to laws?' Congress has approved funding to study her proposal. This initiative represents a significant shift in how legal information might be presented in the future.
2Shortcomings of the Current System
Perez contends current laws are written by and for lawyers, making them difficult for the general public to comprehend. In a 2025 Facebook post, she stated Congress was 'built by lawyers for lawyers.' She believes visual information is as valid as legal jargon and often more accessible. This creates a significant barrier to legal understanding for ordinary citizens. The complexity of legal language has long been criticized for excluding non-experts from fully engaging with the laws that govern them.
3Proposed Solution and Process
In letters to both Republican and Democratic leaders, Perez requested establishing a standardized process for incorporating visuals into laws. Congress has approved an appropriations bill to study the issue and produce a feasibility report. Perez maintains that visuals could communicate legislative intent more clearly than text alone. She argues this modernization would enhance accessibility without compromising legislative integrity. The proposal represents an attempt to bridge the gap between legal professionals and the general public.
4Advantages of Visual Elements
Perez suggests blueprints, diagrams, and maps could simplify complex legal provisions. She particularly highlights benefits for visual learners and technical professionals. Visual materials could make laws accessible beyond just the lawyers working in Pennsylvania Avenue offices. This approach might democratize legal understanding across various demographics. The inclusion of visuals could particularly help those who struggle with text-heavy documents, potentially increasing civic engagement with legislation.
5Criticisms and Challenges
Critics argue visual information is as open to interpretation as written text. Some experts warn visuals might be interpreted in hundreds of different ways, potentially creating inconsistencies among judges. Additionally, they note all fields require specialized knowledge, and oversimplification could lead to misunderstandings. The technical challenges of standardizing visual elements in laws present another hurdle. There are concerns about maintaining precision while making laws more visually accessible.
6Historical Context
The idea of visualizing laws isn't entirely new. Ancient legal systems often used symbols and simple drawings. However, modern legal systems have developed around written texts. Perez's proposal aims to adapt to the visual communication habits of the digital age. The rise of video-based social media and declining reading habits in recent years make such innovations increasingly relevant. This reflects broader societal shifts in how people consume and process information.
7Similar Global Practices
Some countries have taken steps to visualize complex regulations. Sweden, for instance, uses visual elements in tax return forms. Singapore presents some public service instructions in comic format. However, no country has implemented visuals in primary legislation as extensively as proposed in the US. If successful, this initiative could set a global precedent. It represents an innovative approach to making governance more accessible in an increasingly visual culture.
8Democratic Representation and Accessibility
Perez's proposal connects directly to fundamental principles of representative democracy. Understandable laws are crucial for citizens to know their rights and trust the legal system. Visual support could particularly benefit those with limited education or English proficiency. This could enhance democratic participation and strengthen the perceived legitimacy of laws. However, the technical and legal implementation details require careful consideration to maintain legal precision while improving accessibility.
Original article: Gizmodo — Yasaların Görselleştirilmesi: Okuryazarlık Sonrası Döneme Uyum