# WA University Merger Committee Faces Conflict of Interest Allegations Steering committee members face scrutiny over ties to the only institution supporting the merger. - **Source:** [Sydney Morning Herald - Latest News](https://www.smh.com.au/rss/feed.xml) - **Published:** 2026-10-20 - **Topic:** [Business](https://brifing.si/c/business) - **Original article:** - **On Brifing:** https://brifing.si/s/962ddd6c-2e38-4c42-9f5a-4053cf59f16d ## Proposed Mega-Merger Context The Western Australian government is evaluating a potential mega-merger involving Curtin, Murdoch, and the University of Western Australia. A state-appointed steering committee is tasked with developing the business case for this consolidation. Currently, the University of Western Australia stands as the only institution among the three that has offered tentative support. ## Committee Composition Scrutiny Seven committee members have been announced, including chair Mark Barnaba and deputy chair Professor Fiona Wood. Concerns have emerged because a majority of these members hold direct ties to the University of Western Australia. Critics argue this creates a conflict of interest, as the institution is the primary proponent of the merger. ## Mitigating Perceived Conflicts Chair Mark Barnaba recently resigned from his board roles at the University of Western Australia’s business school and investment committee to address impartiality concerns. He maintains that neither he nor his colleagues have formed a preordained opinion. Barnaba emphasizes that the committee remains committed to being objective, independent, and strictly data-driven throughout. ## Opposition and Political Backlash Opposition leader Basil Zempilas has publicly accused the government of engineering a pro-merger outcome. He claims the committee is effectively tasked with selling the benefits of the merger rather than conducting an impartial feasibility study. Zempilas argues that the committee’s public commentary suggests a preconceived idea existed from the very start. ## Economic Projections Cited Despite criticism, the committee points to feasibility studies suggesting significant financial potential. Projections indicate an estimated 8 billion dollars in value over a 20-year period. The committee highlights a benefit-cost ratio ranging between five and 15, describing these figures as compelling rather than marginal, which justifies the ongoing investigation into the merger. ## Broader Stakeholder Representation Premier Roger Cook defended the committee's structure, noting it includes representatives from all involved universities, student bodies, and the National Tertiary Education Union. He argues that individual institutional ties are inevitable given the academic backgrounds of the members. The government maintains that the committee represents a diverse group of experts and leaders. ## Timeline and Public Sentiment The steering committee is scheduled to submit the final business case to the parliament by the middle of next year. Meanwhile, public opposition is intensifying, with a student-led protest organized at the Western Australia Parliament steps. These demonstrations highlight the significant tension surrounding the potential consolidation of the state's major higher education institutions. ## Implications for Institutional Governance This situation underscores the challenges of maintaining perceived neutrality in high-stakes public sector projects. The reliance on industry leaders with deep academic roots creates a delicate balance between expertise and bias. The final report will face intense scrutiny, as the integrity of the decision-making process is as critical as the financial data itself. ## Sources covering this story - https://www.smh.com.au/national/western-australia/most-of-wa-s-mega-university-merger-panel-have-ties-to-this-one-university-20261021-p6173w.html?ref=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_source=rss_feed — --- _Summary written by Brifing from the original reporting. Copyright in the original article belongs to its publisher; read the full piece at the link above._