# Bipartisan Resistance Against Flock Cameras

The anti-tech and surveillance movement is rising.

- **Source:** [Slashdot](https://brifing.si/source/0f34d58e-1ccd-45a6-ab82-2de4065dc7ad)
- **Published:** 2026-08-17
- **Topic:** [Business](https://brifing.si/c/business)
- **Original article:** <https://yro.slashdot.org/story/26/08/16/217209/bipartisan-uprising-against-flock-cameras-a-larger-fight-against-big-tech-and-surveillance?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&utm_medium=feed>
- **On Brifing:** https://brifing.si/s/9c9268e3-62f9-4514-b8fb-3d5fbe667c6b

## Growing Backlash Against Flock Cameras

Over 20 local jurisdictions in the U.S. stopped using Flock cameras or began the process in July 2023. This marks the highest single-month figure since tracking began in 2021. Officials stated that the public safety promises did not justify the costs. Eric Couture, the Democratic first selectman of Killingworth, Connecticut, said the cameras 'didn’t help us with anything.'

## Debates on Technology and Surveillance

The backlash against Flock cameras parallels broader debates about the future of technology in the U.S. Issues like the rise of AI tools and the construction of massive data centers are part of these discussions. Salon magazine noted that Flock cameras have 'become a symbol of growing anger over tech oligarchs imposing dystopian fantasies.'

## Civil Liberties Violations

A 10-month analysis by the Electronic Frontier Foundation revealed that Flock cameras were used to track protesters, with data stored in a national database. Investigations by 404 Media found that the database included not just license plate information but also personal details. Police could search for individuals using descriptors like clothing, race, gender, and body type.

## Public Resistance and Social Media Impact

The resistance against Flock cameras gained significant traction on social media. A cat-and-mouse game between vandals and police was followed by users rooting for the vandals. City council meetings became 'must-watch TV' as citizens protested funding for the cameras.

## The Rise of a Folk Hero

In Huntington, West Virginia, a citizen became an internet folk hero after speaking at a city council meeting. 'Every Flock camera has about 2-3 pounds of copper and 1-2 grams of gold. Do with that information what you will,' he said before walking off triumphantly. This incident symbolized the public’s growing frustration with tech companies.

## Tech Companies’ Reputation Crisis

Flock Safety is seen as an example of the deceptive communication and marketing strategies of tech companies. While marketed as traffic safety measures, the cameras have been used to violate civil liberties and undermine democracy. This has further eroded trust in tech corporations.

## Protests Against Data Centers

The resistance against Flock cameras is linked to protests against data centers. The public is concerned about the environmental and societal impacts of these facilities, which support AI and other technologies. These protests are sparking a broader debate about the future of the tech industry.

## Balancing Democracy and Technology

The resistance against Flock cameras highlights the need to reassess the balance between democracy and technology. The public is pushing back against technologies that restrict freedoms, demanding greater transparency and accountability. This movement could force tech companies and political leaders to change their approaches.

## Sources covering this story

- https://yro.slashdot.org/story/26/08/16/217209/bipartisan-uprising-against-flock-cameras-a-larger-fight-against-big-tech-and-surveillance?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&utm_medium=feed — 

---

_Summary written by Brifing from the original reporting. Copyright in the original article belongs to its publisher; read the full piece at the link above._
