# Lampard Criticizes VAR Decisions After Coventry Defeat to Everton Frank Lampard claims VAR failed to intervene in three controversial incidents during Friday's match. - **Source:** [Sky Sports – Football](https://www.skysports.com/football) - **Published:** 2026-11-06 - **Topic:** [sports](https://brifing.si/c/sports) - **Original article:** - **On Brifing:** https://brifing.si/s/9cc36ec7-0ddc-4dd5-b7d1-9e037dc3704e ## Controversial Officiating Decisions Coventry manager Frank Lampard publicly criticized the VAR performance following a 3-1 defeat to Everton on Friday. Lampard expressed frustration over three specific incidents where video reviews failed to support his side. He emphasized that these pivotal moments significantly altered the game's momentum and ultimately influenced the final match result. ## Tarkowski Hair Pull Incident During the first half, Everton defender James Tarkowski appeared to pull Caleb Yirenkyi’s hair while competing for a high ball. Although VAR reviewed the incident, no penalty was awarded. New Premier League guidance states that hair pulling should be penalized if it impacts an opponent's ability to challenge for the ball. ## Penalty Appeals Denied Taiwo Awoniyi was brought down by Vitalii Mykolenko inside the box, but the referee did not award a penalty. VAR officials determined the contact occurred outside the box, despite replays suggesting the player's foot was on the line. Lampard and pundits argued this should have been a clear penalty for Coventry. ## Handball Goal Dispute Everton's second goal, scored by Thierno Barry, faced scrutiny for a potential handball during the buildup. VAR officials reviewed the play but found no conclusive evidence to overturn the on-field decision. While Lampard insisted the ball touched Barry’s hand, the goal was allowed to stand, further fueling the manager's post-match frustration. ## Managerial Perspectives Everton boss David Moyes acknowledged the complexity of officiating, noting that his team has also suffered from inconsistent decisions in previous matches. He suggested that such calls often balance out over a season. Moyes maintained that while he wants accuracy, he understands the subjective nature of these high-stakes refereeing judgments. ## Punditry and Analysis Sky Sports analysts Jamie Redknapp and Lee Hendrie debated the incidents, agreeing that the hair pull was a foul. They noted that while it might not warrant a red card under current rules, it clearly hindered Yirenkyi. Pundits expressed concern over the speed and consistency of the VAR review process during the match. ## VAR Protocol Challenges The match highlighted ongoing tensions regarding the 'clear and obvious' threshold for VAR intervention. Critics argue that forensic analysis of accidental handballs or borderline fouls can disrupt the game's flow. The debate centers on whether officials should intervene more frequently or maintain the current standard to avoid excessive match delays. ## Impact on Match Outcome The 3-1 loss leaves Coventry reflecting on missed opportunities caused by disputed officiating. Lampard’s comments underscore the growing pressure on VAR to provide consistent, transparent rulings in the Premier League. As the season progresses, the effectiveness of these review protocols remains a central point of contention for managers and fans. ## Sources covering this story - https://www.skysports.com/football/news/11095/13609067/everton-3-1-coventry-frank-lampard-says-var-didnt-do-its-job-after-three-incidents-went-against-sky-blues-in-premier-league-defeat — --- _Summary written by Brifing from the original reporting. Copyright in the original article belongs to its publisher; read the full piece at the link above._