# Trump and Xi Agree to Rename AI as 'Super Intelligence' Leaders establish new terminology in bilateral talks on emerging technologies. - **Source:** [Gizmodo](https://brifing.si/source/63382431-cef0-4c41-883e-2f88dc21351e) - **Published:** 2026-09-26 - **Topic:** [Business](https://brifing.si/c/business) - **Original article:** - **On Brifing:** https://brifing.si/s/a31d519b-47b7-40d0-89c6-330154af1aec ## Terminology shift in diplomacy The White House released a fact sheet confirming that Presidents Trump and Xi agreed to use 'Super Intelligence' (SI) instead of 'Artificial Intelligence' (AI) when referring to emerging technologies. This change appears in the security section of bilateral agreements from Xi's recent state visit. The document frames this as part of efforts to 'make the world safer for Americans,' alongside discussions about drug enforcement and energy security. ## Trump's branding campaign The term 'Super Intelligence' reflects Trump's week-long push to rebrand AI, starting with polls about terminology before settling on SI. Administration officials now enforce this language, as seen when Counterterrorism Director Sebastian Gorka corrected a journalist mid-interview. The White House maintains this isn't merely semantic but represents an official policy position on how to discuss the technology. ## Bilateral communication framework Beyond terminology, the fact sheet establishes new U.S.-China communication channels about SI risks. Representatives will meet in November to discuss SI's benefits and dangers, plus a dedicated line for reporting 'SI incidents.' While analysts note the summit produced no major breakthroughs, expanded dialogue could help prevent escalation in tech-related disputes between the superpowers. ## Political context of tech language The terminology debate occurs amid broader political tensions around AI governance. Trump has framed AI regulation as requiring 'a STRONG AND SMART PRESIDENT' rather than external guardrails. Meanwhile, his administration continues taking hardline positions on tech security, as seen in recent court victories allowing voter citizenship checks and labeling certain AI firms as supply chain risks. ## Diplomatic signaling through semantics The SI rebranding serves multiple diplomatic purposes: it creates shared language for U.S.-China tech discussions, reinforces Trump's domestic messaging about American leadership in emerging tech, and allows both leaders to demonstrate progress without substantive policy concessions. The focus on terminology rather than concrete regulations reflects current limitations in bilateral tech cooperation. ## Implementation challenges ahead While the SI terminology appears in official documents, its practical adoption remains uncertain. The agreement doesn't specify enforcement mechanisms or consequences for using 'AI.' Given that technical communities and other governments still use traditional terms, maintaining this linguistic alignment may prove difficult as discussions move to technical working groups in November. ## Global tech discourse implications The U.S.-China agreement could influence how other nations discuss AI, potentially creating bifurcation between countries adopting 'SI' and those sticking with 'AI.' However, without buy-in from tech companies and international standards bodies, the terminology may remain confined to diplomatic contexts rather than affecting technical or commercial usage patterns. ## Long-term strategic considerations This terminology agreement sets precedent for future tech diplomacy by demonstrating that even amid tensions, the U.S. and China can establish shared frameworks for emerging technologies. The focus on communication channels suggests both powers recognize the need for basic coordination mechanisms as AI/SI becomes increasingly central to economic and military competition. ## Sources covering this story - https://gizmodo.com/trump-gets-xi-to-agree-to-call-ai-super-intelligence-white-house-says-2000817802 — --- _Summary written by Brifing from the original reporting. Copyright in the original article belongs to its publisher; read the full piece at the link above._