# JSC Sets November Hearing for Judge Belinda Hartle Over Racial Slur The Judicial Service Commission will investigate allegations of gross misconduct against Judge Belinda Hartle. - **Source:** [IOL News](https://www.iol.co.za/news) - **Published:** 2026-11-06 - **Topic:** [politics](https://brifing.si/c/politics) - **Original article:** - **On Brifing:** https://brifing.si/s/aa01500f-0284-4d04-9b28-7b9c1b85f25d ## Tribunal Hearing Dates Confirmed The Judicial Service Commission has officially scheduled a disciplinary hearing for Judge Belinda Hartle of the Eastern Cape High Court. The proceedings will take place in Sandton from November 9 to 18. This tribunal follows a formal complaint regarding alleged derogatory and racist remarks made by the judge during May 2025. ## Nature of the Allegations Complainant Thozamile Semekazi, an employee at the Office of the Chief Justice, alleged that Judge Hartle used a highly offensive racial slur against him in her chambers. Semekazi claims the judge was irritated by delays in case file management and directed aggressive, demeaning language at him during the encounter on May 15. ## Judge Hartle's Defense Response Judge Hartle acknowledged her frustration regarding file management but denied using any racist terminology. She admitted to using a single expletive during the interaction, claiming it was directed at her secretary rather than Semekazi. She further characterized the formal complaint as a bogus charge and questioned the complainant's motives behind the legal action. ## Tribunal Composition and Oversight The Judicial Conduct Tribunal is led by retired Supreme Court of Appeal Justices B H Mbha and S E Weiner. Advocate P Seleka SC serves as the non-judicial member of the panel. This group was appointed to investigate the prima facie evidence of gross misconduct identified by the Judicial Conduct Committee in December 2025. ## Impact on the Complainant Semekazi stated that the incident caused him significant psychological distress, leading to a diagnosis of major depressive disorder. He required hospitalization for treatment following the alleged verbal abuse. He argues that the use of such language renders the judge unfit to hold office, citing the insult as demeaning to all African colleagues. ## Procedural History of Case The investigation reached this stage after the Judicial Conduct Committee ruled on December 9, 2025, that there was sufficient evidence of gross misconduct. The committee recommended the formation of a tribunal to conduct a formal inquiry. This process ensures that the judiciary maintains accountability regarding the conduct of its presiding officers. ## Context of Judicial Conduct The case highlights the rigorous standards expected of judicial officers in South Africa. The tribunal must determine if the judge's actions violated the code of conduct governing the judiciary. The outcome will depend on whether the panel finds the evidence of the racial slur credible, given the conflicting accounts of the event. ## Significance of the Inquiry This hearing represents a critical test for the Judicial Service Commission in addressing allegations of racism within the legal system. The findings will have lasting implications for Judge Hartle's career and the public's trust in the judiciary. Observers will monitor the proceedings to see how the tribunal balances judicial independence with accountability. ## Sources covering this story - https://iol.co.za/news/crime-and-courts/2026-11-06-jsc-sets-november-hearing-for-judge-belinda-hartle-over-alleged-racial-slur/ — --- _Summary written by Brifing from the original reporting. Copyright in the original article belongs to its publisher; read the full piece at the link above._