# Liberal Party Leader Criticized for Silence on Lundsberg Boarding School Scandal Internal party dynamics and electoral concerns reportedly silenced Minister Simona Mohamsson regarding school abuse allegations. - **Source:** [Expressen](https://www.expressen.se) - **Published:** 2026-11-11 - **Topic:** [politics](https://brifing.si/c/politics) - **Original article:** - **On Brifing:** https://brifing.si/s/b314e176-0b82-4f38-a886-0fdde069c65a ## Silence Amidst Abuse Allegations Education Minister Simona Mohamsson has faced criticism for her lack of public commentary regarding the 2026 abuse allegations at Lundsberg boarding school. Despite the Liberal Party's historical focus on school policy, the party leadership remained conspicuously quiet following reports of systemic hazing and mistreatment at the prestigious institution. ## Historical Policy Contrast The current silence marks a significant departure from the party's 2013 stance under Jan Björklund. At that time, the Liberal Party took a firm position against Lundsberg, questioning its special status and successfully stripping the school of its specific state subsidies following reports of students being burned with irons. ## Internal Party Dynamics Sources within the Liberal Party indicate that Mohamsson’s reticence is tied to her relationship with party colleague Martin Melin. Melin, whose son attends Lundsberg, publicly defended the school following the release of the SVT documentary 'Arvtagarna', which exposed racism and systematic abuse occurring within the boarding school's environment. ## Electoral Strategy Concerns Beyond personal loyalty, party leadership reportedly feared that taking a hard stance against Lundsberg could alienate potential voters from the upper class. By avoiding the topic, the party aimed to maintain support among its affluent base while navigating the sensitive optics of a high-profile member defending the institution. ## The Role of Martin Melin Martin Melin, a prominent party figure, became a focal point of the controversy due to his public defense of the school. Because of his popularity, Mohamsson allegedly avoided challenging him publicly during the heat of the election campaign, prioritizing party unity over addressing the serious allegations raised by the documentary. ## Broader Institutional Scrutiny The silence extended beyond Lundsberg to include Sigtunaskolan, another institution currently appearing in public debates regarding school culture. Party leadership has actively avoided commenting on these schools to prevent further political friction, despite the Liberal Party's branding as Sweden's primary 'school party' during the recent national election cycle. ## Political Consequences Observed Despite the party leadership's efforts to avoid internal conflict, Martin Melin did not secure a seat in the Riksdag during the election. He currently serves as the first reserve for the Liberal Party, highlighting the limited political success of the strategy employed by the party leadership during the campaign period. ## Implications for Accountability The situation underscores the tension between political pragmatism and institutional oversight in Swedish education policy. By prioritizing electoral stability and internal harmony over addressing systemic abuse, the Liberal Party faces ongoing scrutiny regarding its commitment to its core platform of school reform and student safety in the face of controversy. ## Sources covering this story - https://www.expressen.se/nyheter/politik/l-kallor-darfor-var-mohamsson-tyst-om-lundsberg/ — --- _Summary written by Brifing from the original reporting. Copyright in the original article belongs to its publisher; read the full piece at the link above._