# Police Charge Tesla Driver Caught Sleeping During Rush Hour Traffic Authorities warn that automation complacency remains a critical safety risk for vehicle operators. - **Source:** [Electrek](https://electrek.co) - **Published:** 2026-11-12 - **Topic:** [technology](https://brifing.si/c/technology) - **Original article:** - **On Brifing:** https://brifing.si/s/b3a23f40-fe2e-43d8-bbca-1603db88545c ## Incident in Ottawa Traffic An Ontario driver was recently charged with careless driving after being spotted asleep behind the wheel of a Tesla Model Y on Highway 417. Police observed the individual with eyes closed and hands off the steering wheel during heavy rush hour traffic, highlighting ongoing risks associated with advanced driver-assist systems. ## Legal Consequences and Penalties The driver faces a $490 fine and six demerit points under Ontario's Highway Traffic Act. While this is the initial set fine, court convictions can escalate penalties to $2,000, six months of jail time, and a two-year license suspension, reflecting the severity with which Canadian authorities treat distracted and sleeping drivers. ## Rising Trend of Complacency This incident marks at least the fifth time this year that Canadian police have publicly addressed sleeping Tesla drivers. Experts identify this as automation complacency, a well-studied phenomenon where humans monitoring highly reliable systems eventually stop paying attention, leading to dangerous lapses in supervision during long highway stretches or heavy traffic. ## System Limitations and Monitoring Tesla’s cabin camera monitors attentiveness but often relies on head position rather than direct eye-tracking. The system remains active even if a driver wears sunglasses, and it can be fooled by resting a hand on the steering wheel, which provides enough torque to bypass alerts designed to ensure the driver is engaged. ## Industry Approaches to Safety Unlike Tesla, competitors like GM’s Super Cruise utilize steering column cameras with infrared LEDs to track eye position precisely. Waymo previously abandoned similar semi-autonomous testing models in 2013, concluding that systems requiring human intervention are inherently flawed, opting instead to pursue fully driverless technology to eliminate the risk of human error. ## Escalating Risks and Warnings Recent software updates have reportedly reduced the frequency of driver alerts, with some messages even encouraging drowsy drivers to stay focused while using the system. This approach contrasts with safety advocates who argue that vehicles should immediately slow down and pull over when they detect a driver is unresponsive or asleep. ## Broader Regulatory Challenges The problem extends beyond Canada, with similar incidents reported across the United States, including a collision in California where a Tesla hit a patrol car. Despite a 2023 NHTSA recall involving over two million vehicles to address weak monitoring, drivers continue to rely on the system in ways that compromise road safety. ## Need for Systemic Fixes Police enforcement alone cannot solve the issue of drivers misusing autonomous features. Effective solutions require technical improvements, such as mandatory infrared eye-tracking and more aggressive vehicle responses when inattention is detected. Until these changes occur, the burden of safety remains precariously placed on human drivers who are prone to distraction. ## Sources covering this story - https://electrek.co/2026/11/12/tesla-driver-asleep-ottawa-opp-careless-driving-fsd/ — --- _Summary written by Brifing from the original reporting. Copyright in the original article belongs to its publisher; read the full piece at the link above._