Brifing

Meta Challenges Apple's Plan for EU-Mandated Device Interoperability

Meta criticizes Apple's approach to third-party device integration under EU regulations.

9to5Mac1 min

1The dispute between Meta and Apple

Meta and Apple have been debating for months over how Apple should implement third-party device access under the EU's Digital Markets Act. This aims to provide access similar to Apple products like AirPods and Apple Watch.

2EU's Digital Markets Act

The EU's Digital Markets Act requires Apple to open certain iPhone and iPad features to third-party devices. This includes proximity-triggered pairing, which was introduced in the EU with iOS 26.5.

3Meta's request

Meta wants Apple to allow Ray-Ban Meta glasses and Quest headsets to automatically sync across a user's other iPhones and iPads after pairing with one device. This mirrors how AirPods sync across Apple devices.

4Apple's proposal

In response to Meta's request, Apple proposed a new API that would allow third-party apps to sync pairing information. However, Meta argued that tying the API to AccessorySetupKit could disrupt its existing pairing experience outside the EU.

5Technical debates

Meta claimed Apple's proposal could worsen the setup experience for its devices outside the EU. Apple countered that other developers had adopted AccessorySetupKit without issues and that the solution met Meta's core request.

6Outcome and significance

The dispute between Meta and Apple highlights the impact of EU competition rules on tech giants. The outcome could shape how third-party devices integrate into Apple's ecosystem.

Original article: 9to5Mac — Meta, Apple'ın AB uyumlu cihaz entegrasyon planına itiraz ediyor