# STF Upholds Marco Buzzi's Suspension from STJ Amid Harassment Allegations Supreme Court maintains judge's removal while preserving salary pending final disciplinary verdict. - **Source:** [G1 – Política](https://g1.globo.com/politica) - **Published:** 2026-11-12 - **Topic:** [politics](https://brifing.si/c/politics) - **Original article:** - **On Brifing:** https://brifing.si/s/c16166f2-79d5-432a-8bba-60182520df97 ## Supreme Court Ruling Details Minister Nunes Marques of the Supreme Federal Court upheld the suspension of Marco Buzzi from the Superior Tribunal de Justiça. While the removal from active duty remains in effect, the court denied the immediate suspension of his salary. Buzzi received 24,000 Brazilian Reais in September following the disciplinary action taken in August. ## Disciplinary Process Background The Superior Tribunal de Justiça previously decided to punish Buzzi for violating functional duties related to sexual harassment and importuning allegations. This administrative process resulted in his removal from the bench. The court is now preparing to initiate procedures to fill the vacancy, which involves submitting a list of candidates to President Lula. ## Legal Challenges Filed Two separate legal actions are currently under review by the Supreme Court regarding this case. Buzzi's defense team filed an appeal to challenge the punishment imposed by the STJ. Simultaneously, the Advocacia-Geral da União requested the total loss of his position and the immediate suspension of all salary payments during the ongoing legal proceedings. ## Shift in Judicial Penalties The government's request aligns with a new understanding from the Supreme Court's First Panel and the National Council of Justice. This policy shifts the standard punishment for severe magistrate violations from compulsory retirement to the loss of office. The Union argues that judicial tenure does not protect officials from losing their positions entirely. ## Rationale for Salary Retention Nunes Marques determined that the suspension of salary payments should only occur after a definitive final judgment. The court emphasizes that the magistrate must be granted the right to a full defense before such financial measures are finalized. Consequently, the salary remains active until the Supreme Court reaches a collective decision on the matter. ## Precedent for Severe Violations This case marks the first instance where a high-ranking minister faced the new maximum penalty defined by the National Council of Justice for grave misconduct. The disciplinary process highlights a stricter approach to judicial accountability. The Supreme Court is now tasked with balancing institutional integrity against the established rights of the accused official. ## Procedural Next Steps The ongoing actions are currently under judicial seal, though Nunes Marques has authorized their continuation. Buzzi is now permitted to present further arguments and evidence in his defense. The final resolution of this dispute is expected to be handled by the Second Panel of the Supreme Court, ensuring a collective judicial review process. ## Institutional Impact Assessment The outcome of this case will likely set a significant precedent for how the Brazilian judiciary handles internal misconduct. By maintaining the suspension while debating the loss of office, the court navigates complex constitutional protections. The final decision will determine the future of Buzzi's career and the broader enforcement of judicial ethics. ## Sources covering this story - https://g1.globo.com/politica/noticia/2026/11/12/stf-mantem-afastamento-de-marco-buzzi-do-stj-apos-acusacao-de-assedio-mas-mantem-salario.ghtml — --- _Summary written by Brifing from the original reporting. Copyright in the original article belongs to its publisher; read the full piece at the link above._