# Polish Senate Passes Rule of Law Bill Targeting Judicial Appointments The legislation aims to annul controversial judicial appointments made between 2018 and 2026. - **Source:** [Rzeczpospolita](https://www.rp.pl) - **Published:** 2026-11-06 - **Topic:** [politics](https://brifing.si/c/politics) - **Original article:** - **On Brifing:** https://brifing.si/s/cc3f8730-4ca7-479d-bd59-8c002c588b0d ## Senate Approves Judicial Reform The Polish Senate passed the rule of law bill with 63 votes in favor and 32 against. This act, dated October 22, 2026, seeks to restore the right to an independent court. It specifically addresses the legal status of judges appointed based on National Council of the Judiciary resolutions from 2018 to 2026. ## Nullifying Controversial Appointments The core mechanism involves stripping legal force from National Council of the Judiciary resolutions issued between March 2018 and May 2026. Consequently, judicial positions filled during this period will be declared vacant. New recruitment procedures will be conducted to fill these roles, aiming to resolve systemic disputes regarding the legitimacy of current judicial appointments. ## Impact on Sitting Judges Judges appointed during the specified period must return to their previous positions or former professions, such as prosecutors or legal advisors. However, the law provides an exception for junior judges, whose appointments will be confirmed by law. These beginners will retain their status without the risk of future challenges to their judicial legitimacy. ## Structural Changes to Judiciary The legislation mandates the abolition of the Supreme Court's Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs Chamber. Furthermore, the institution of the extraordinary complaint will be eliminated. To maintain legal oversight, the bill strengthens the standard cassation complaint process. These changes represent a significant shift in the operational structure of the Polish Supreme Court system. ## Managing Past Court Rulings Existing rulings issued by judges appointed under the contested resolutions will generally remain in force. An exception applies only to cases where the judge's legal status was consistently challenged throughout the proceedings. This approach aims to balance the need for systemic reform with the necessity of maintaining legal stability for past court decisions. ## Presidential Decision Pending The bill now awaits the signature of President Karol Nawrocki to become law. The political opposition remains hopeful that the President will refuse to sign the legislation, effectively blocking its implementation. The final outcome remains uncertain as the executive branch evaluates the potential impact of these sweeping changes on the national legal system. ## Efficiency and Legal Order The Ministry of Justice argues that clarifying the status of judges will eliminate mass motions for their disqualification. By resolving these procedural bottlenecks, the government expects to accelerate the processing of pending court cases. This reform is presented as a necessary step to restore public trust in the impartiality of the Polish judiciary. ## International and Legal Context The Venice Commission has already issued an opinion regarding the draft law during its plenary session. The bill reflects ongoing tensions between political authorities and judicial institutions regarding the interpretation of European Court of Justice rulings. This legislative move marks a critical juncture in the long-standing debate over judicial independence in Poland. ## Sources covering this story - https://www.rp.pl/sady-i-trybunaly/art45456641-ustawa-praworzadnosciowa-przyjeta-przez-senat-bez-poprawek-teraz-o-jej-losie-zdecyduje-prezydent — --- _Summary written by Brifing from the original reporting. Copyright in the original article belongs to its publisher; read the full piece at the link above._