# Crypto IPOs Face Severe Market Struggles

Recent public listings in the crypto sector show significant underperformance compared to broader indices.

- **Source:** [Fortune](https://fortune.com)
- **Published:** 2026-10-19
- **Topic:** [Finance](https://brifing.si/c/finance)
- **Original article:** <https://fortune.com/2026/10/19/recent-crypto-ipo-wipeout-most-investors-next-wave-be-better/>
- **On Brifing:** https://brifing.si/s/ce0130d2-51cf-4013-baac-da5d9d5deb22

## Market Performance Discrepancy

Since early 2025, the broader U.S. stock market has experienced a significant boom, yet crypto companies have largely failed to mirror this success. While the S&P 500 returned approximately 13% during this period, most newly public crypto firms have seen their share prices plummet, signaling a disconnect between sector hype and actual investor returns.

## Traditional IPO Failures

Among traditional IPOs, only Circle maintains a price near its listing value, bolstered by a strong opening day in June 2025. Conversely, firms like BitGo, Bullish, and eToro have suffered declines between 55% and 65%. Gemini represents the most extreme case, with its market capitalization shrinking from $3.3 billion to roughly half a billion dollars.

## SPAC and Alternative Listings

Non-traditional paths to public markets, such as SPACs, have yielded similarly grim results for most participants. While Galaxy and Securitize underperformed, American Bitcoin saw a staggering 93% decline. Hyperliquid Strategies stands as a notable exception, achieving a 200% gain since its debut earlier this year, proving that specific business models can still thrive.

## Impact of Frothy Conditions

The poor performance is partly attributed to the frothy market environment of 2025, which encouraged underwriters to support nearly any IPO. This lack of discipline allowed companies with weak fundamentals to enter public markets. Investors are now realizing that initial enthusiasm often masked the underlying risks associated with these specific digital asset business models.

## Commoditization and Competition

Many laggards like Gemini and Bullish struggle because they offer commodity services in a hyper-competitive landscape. They lack the scale to compete against established giants like Coinbase or traditional Wall Street firms. These incumbents possess deeper pockets and stronger brands, making it difficult for second-tier crypto players to maintain their market share effectively.

## Upcoming Market Entrants

Despite the recent wipeout, several prominent firms are signaling imminent IPO plans. Payward, known as Kraken, along with MetaMask and hardware manufacturer Ledger, are preparing for public listings. Additionally, MoonPay and blockchain forensics firm Chainalysis are potential candidates, testing whether the market will remain receptive to new crypto-native companies after the recent failures.

## Strategic Success Factors

The divergence in performance suggests that success in public markets requires more than just crypto-native status. Companies like Circle demonstrate the importance of scale, while Hyperliquid Strategies highlights the value of a clever business model and strong leadership. Future entrants must prove they offer unique value beyond standard custody or basic trading services.

## Investor Caution Remains Essential

The 2025 wave of crypto IPOs serves as a cautionary tale for institutional and retail investors alike. While blockchain-first firms can succeed, the high failure rate indicates that rigorous due diligence is required. Moving forward, market participants must distinguish between firms with sustainable competitive advantages and those merely riding the wave of sector trends.

## Sources covering this story

- https://fortune.com/2026/10/19/recent-crypto-ipo-wipeout-most-investors-next-wave-be-better/ — 

---

_Summary written by Brifing from the original reporting. Copyright in the original article belongs to its publisher; read the full piece at the link above._
