ADC Accuses Nigerian Government of Obstructing Opposition Activities
The opposition party claims state authorities are blocking venues and delaying critical legal documents.
1Opposition Faces Venue Restrictions
The African Democratic Congress (ADC) alleges that the Kaduna State Government sealed the historic Arewa House to prevent a scheduled consultation. Presidential candidate Atiku Abubakar intended to meet Northern stakeholders at the facility on Thursday. The party views this closure as a deliberate attempt to stifle their political campaign activities.
2Legal Documentation Delay Tactics
Phrank Shaibu, director of the ADC Presidential Campaign Council, criticized the Federal High Court for delaying the release of a certified judgement. Judge Peter Lifu issued the document on the final day of the seven-day constitutional limit. This delay significantly restricts the party's ability to study the ruling and prepare appeals.
3Leadership Crisis and Nullification
The controversy stems from a 5 November court ruling that nullified the leadership of National Chairman Mark. The judgement, initiated by former deputy Nafiu Gombe, also voided actions taken by the current leadership, including the nomination of Atiku Abubakar for the 2027 presidential race, creating deep uncertainty for the party.
4Pattern of Political Interference
The ADC claims this is part of a broader strategy by the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) to weaken opposition. They cited an earlier incident in Sokoto during their campaign flag-off, where they alleged the state government attempted to frustrate their event. The party maintains that these actions undermine democratic competition.
5Judiciary Under Public Pressure
Supporters and candidates protested at the Federal High Court in Abuja on Wednesday, demanding the immediate release of the certified true copy of the judgement. The party had petitioned the Chief Judge, noting that they applied for the document and paid all prescribed fees immediately after the initial 5 November ruling.
6Constitutional Rights and Appeals
Citing Section 294(1) of the 1999 Constitution, the ADC argues that courts are legally required to provide authenticated copies of decisions within seven days. By releasing the document on the final day, the party contends the court is effectively obstructing their constitutional right to pursue lawful remedies at the appellate level.
7Escalating Tensions in Nigeria
The conflict highlights the fragile state of political engagement in Nigeria as parties prepare for future electoral cycles. By holding President Tinubu and the APC politically responsible, the ADC is signaling a shift toward more aggressive legal and public challenges against what they characterize as the weaponization of public authority.
8Future Legal Strategy Outlook
The ADC has vowed not to be intimidated by these administrative hurdles. They intend to study the court's decision thoroughly and pursue every available legal remedy to restore their leadership's legitimacy. The party remains committed to continuing its consultations with voters despite the ongoing legal and physical barriers they face.