# OnlyFans Creators Criticize Meta for Allowing Explicit AI Interactions Creators challenge Meta's double standard regarding adult content on social versus AI platforms. - **Source:** [Wired](https://www.wired.com) - **Published:** 2026-10-18 - **Topic:** [Marketing](https://brifing.si/c/marketing) - **Original article:** - **On Brifing:** https://brifing.si/s/d295c4af-4a7c-43ba-aab7-a68eb8e64d3e ## Meta's Content Moderation Discrepancy Meta faces backlash from adult content creators who report strict censorship on Instagram while the company's new AI agent, Muse, permits explicit sexting. Creators argue this creates an unfair environment where Meta monetizes adult-oriented AI interactions while simultaneously restricting human performers from promoting their own legal, adult-focused services on social media. ## The Muse AI Agent Mechanics Muse is an always-on AI assistant that integrates with personal data like calendars and emails to provide proactive help. Unlike Meta's social platforms, the Muse app is gated for users 18 and older, allowing the AI to engage in X-rated text conversations, a policy Meta justifies as not blocking legal adult behavior. ## Impact on Human Performers Creators like Vanniall report frequent account restrictions and deepfake issues, making audience growth on Instagram nearly impossible. These performers feel marginalized by current moderation policies, noting that while their human-led content is flagged or removed, Meta's own AI products are granted significantly more freedom to engage in sexually explicit digital interactions. ## Regulatory and Historical Context Industry experts trace current online censorship trends back to the 2018 FOSTA-SESTA law, which altered Section 230 protections. This legal shift forced many platforms to aggressively censor adult content to avoid liability. Performers argue that decriminalizing sex work would alleviate these systemic censorship issues and protect their ability to operate online. ## Data Privacy and Training Concerns There is growing anxiety among creators regarding how Muse was trained and whether human data was used without compensation. Performers are now actively seeking to clarify AI usage in official contracts to prevent their likenesses or personal content from being harvested to train competitive AI models that could eventually displace them. ## Future of AI-Human Collaboration Some performers, such as Tony Genius, are exploring ways to leverage AI for marketing tasks like video clipping while remaining wary of full automation. There is interest in potential collaborations where creators could license their own AI versions, provided they maintain control over their brand and ensure fair compensation for their digital likeness. ## Platform Migration and Visibility Due to Meta's restrictive environment, many adult creators have migrated to platforms like X and Bluesky, which maintain more permissive policies regarding adult content. Despite the frustration, creators continue to view Meta platforms as critical for visibility, often cycling through multiple accounts to bypass ongoing bans and maintain their professional online presence. ## The Call for Equitable Spaces Creators are questioning why Meta refuses to build dedicated, age-gated social spaces for adult content while simultaneously deploying explicit AI agents. The industry remains divided on whether AI represents a tool for growth or an existential threat, emphasizing the urgent need for platforms to establish transparent, equitable policies for all adult users. ## Sources covering this story - https://www.wired.com/story/onlyfans-creators-are-pissed-that-meta-lets-muse-talk-dirty/ — --- _Summary written by Brifing from the original reporting. Copyright in the original article belongs to its publisher; read the full piece at the link above._