# Fedez Faces Trial Over Defamation Allegations Regarding Podcast Statements The Italian rapper stands accused of defaming Joe Bevilacqua during a 2023 podcast episode. - **Source:** [Open](https://www.open.online) - **Published:** 2026-11-09 - **Topic:** [entertainment](https://brifing.si/c/entertainment) - **Original article:** - **On Brifing:** https://brifing.si/s/db16de51-f759-4ff7-9758-9ef35140460e ## Legal Proceedings in Milan Italian rapper Fedez is currently facing trial in a Milan courtroom for aggravated defamation. The charges stem from comments made during a 2023 episode of his podcast, Muschio Selvaggio. The legal action was initiated by the family of Joe Bevilacqua, who claim the artist damaged the reputation of their late relative. ## The Controversial Podcast Statements During the December 4, 2023, broadcast, Fedez discussed the infamous Monster of Florence serial killer case. He suggested that Joe Bevilacqua, a former American military officer, could be the same individual as the American serial killer known as Zodiac. This claim directly linked Bevilacqua to multiple historical murders in Italy and the US. ## Family Claims Reputation Damage The family of Joe Bevilacqua argues that these public accusations were deeply defamatory. They maintain that falsely identifying their relative as a notorious serial killer caused significant harm to his legacy. The legal complaint focuses on the gravity of these claims, which were broadcast to a large audience on the popular podcast platform. ## Defense Strategy and Intent Fedez, represented by attorneys Gabriele Minniti and Andrea Pietrolucci, denies any malicious intent. He argues that his statements were clearly framed as conspiracy theories rather than factual assertions. The rapper claims he used an intentionally hyperbolic tone to signal that he was not presenting verified investigative findings to his listeners during the show. ## Citing Previous Legal Precedents To demonstrate his lack of bad faith, Fedez referenced the legal history surrounding these theories. He noted that journalist Francesco Amicone had previously been convicted for defamation regarding similar claims about Bevilacqua. Fedez argued that by mentioning this, he was providing context rather than endorsing the conspiracy theory as an established fact. ## Emphasis on Editorial Context The rapper testified that he explicitly labeled his commentary as dietrological and conspiratorial during the episode. He asserted that his goal was to explore the mystery surrounding the Monster of Florence, a case that has long fascinated the public. He claimed his tone was meant to be understood as clearly satirical or investigative. ## Scope of Podcast Research Fedez defended the quality of his podcast production, noting that the series on the Monster of Florence attracted significant interest. He highlighted that his work on the subject was substantial enough to capture the attention of various television programs and even a parliamentary commission of inquiry, suggesting his intent was journalistic exploration. ## Implications for Digital Media This trial highlights the growing legal risks for podcast hosts and digital content creators regarding defamatory speech. As podcasts gain influence, the distinction between entertainment, conspiracy theories, and factual reporting becomes a critical legal battleground. The outcome of this case may set a precedent for how Italian courts handle online media liability. ## Sources covering this story - https://www.open.online/2026/11/09/fedez-processo-diffamazione-podcast-mostro-firenze/ — --- _Summary written by Brifing from the original reporting. Copyright in the original article belongs to its publisher; read the full piece at the link above._