# Supreme Court Judges Attempt to Enforce Ruling at Constitutional Tribunal Bogdan Święczkowski and colleagues demand entry to the Constitutional Tribunal following a Supreme Court decision. - **Source:** [Interia Fakty](https://fakty.interia.pl) - **Published:** 2026-11-12 - **Topic:** [politics](https://brifing.si/c/politics) - **Original article:** - **On Brifing:** https://brifing.si/s/e2d33bcc-4a02-44a8-92b0-39fc2e25a675 ## Judicial Standoff at Tribunal Bogdan Święczkowski, alongside judges Stanisław Piotrowicz and Jarosław Wyrembak, arrived at the Constitutional Tribunal gates before 11:00 AM. They sought to enforce a Supreme Court ruling that overturned the suspension of the Tribunal's president and vice-president, Bartłomiej Sochański. The group arrived with official documentation intended for immediate execution by authorities. ## Police Confrontation and Demands Święczkowski utilized a megaphone to address police officers stationed at the site, demanding the immediate presence of their commanding officer. He insisted that the officers accept the Supreme Court's ruling, which he claimed was already transmitted electronically to all Tribunal staff. The officers remained stationary, declining to engage with the judges. ## Accusations of Cowardice Observing the lack of response from law enforcement, Święczkowski openly criticized the officers, labeling their refusal to accept the document as cowardice. He emphasized that the document was merely a piece of paper, dismissing any potential safety concerns. His verbal confrontation highlighted the escalating tension between the judiciary and the security forces. ## Threat of Bailiff Intervention Failing to secure cooperation from the police, Święczkowski suggested that he might need to involve a bailiff to regain access to the building. He warned the officers that their refusal to act on the Supreme Court's mandate could be interpreted as criminal behavior, urging them to reconsider their current stance and duties. ## Public Posting of Ruling After failing to hand over the document directly to the police command, Święczkowski proceeded to attach the Supreme Court resolution to the institution's gate. This symbolic act served as a final attempt to publicize the legal mandate before the group concluded their immediate efforts to enter the premises of the Constitutional Tribunal. ## Legal Context of Suspension The conflict stems from a Supreme Court decision that invalidated the internal suspension of the Tribunal's leadership. This legal maneuver is part of a broader, ongoing institutional struggle regarding the legitimacy of judicial appointments and administrative control within Poland's highest legal bodies. The situation remains fluid as both sides assert conflicting legal authorities. ## Institutional Power Dynamics The presence of multiple judges at the gate underscores the depth of the rift within the judicial system. By attempting to physically enforce the Supreme Court's decree, the judges are challenging the current operational status of the Tribunal. This event highlights the breakdown of traditional administrative communication channels between these high-level state institutions. ## Implications for Judicial Authority The refusal of police to intervene in this dispute signals a complex administrative deadlock. As the Supreme Court ruling remains unexecuted within the Tribunal building, the incident raises questions about the enforceability of judicial orders in the face of institutional resistance. Observers are now watching for potential further legal or executive actions. ## Sources covering this story - https://wydarzenia.interia.pl/kraj/news-sedziowie-zjawili-sie-przed-tk-zaczeli-odczytywac-wyrok,nId,23572475 — --- _Summary written by Brifing from the original reporting. Copyright in the original article belongs to its publisher; read the full piece at the link above._