# Tech Giants Sue California Over Law Restricting Addictive Features for Minors Google, Meta, and TikTok challenge legislation aiming to curb addictive social media features for children. - **Source:** [Deadline](https://deadline.com) - **Published:** 2026-11-05 - **Topic:** [politics](https://brifing.si/c/politics) - **Original article:** - **On Brifing:** https://brifing.si/s/e523ab08-a5ea-4bb0-9fc8-527b68798b31 ## Legal Challenge Initiated Google, Meta, and TikTok filed lawsuits against California to block the Digital Age Assurance Act, or AB 1709. The legislation, signed by Governor Gavin Newsom in September, aims to restrict platforms from offering addictive features to users under sixteen. The companies seek a court order to prevent the law from taking effect on January 1. ## First Amendment Arguments The tech companies argue the law violates the First Amendment by infringing on their editorial discretion. Google claims the law burdens its right to curate third-party content, while Meta asserts that its personalized feeds represent protected expressive choices. TikTok maintains that the state is unconstitutionally dictating how it presents video compilations to younger users. ## Section 230 Preemption Google specifically contends that the new California law is preempted by Section 230 of the federal Communications Decency Act. The company argues that the state cannot impose these restrictions because federal law already governs platform liability regarding third-party content. This legal strategy challenges the state's authority to regulate platform-level content organization and display mechanisms. ## Impact on Platform Features The law threatens core functionalities including YouTube’s recommendation system, TikTok’s 'For You' feed, and Meta’s personalized content displays. Companies argue these features are essential for delivering age-appropriate content and maintaining user engagement. They assert that restricting autoplay and algorithmic curation fundamentally alters the services they provide to their younger demographic of users. ## Legislative Intent and Defense Assemblymember Josh Lowenthal, who introduced the bill, criticized the lawsuit as a continuation of corporate efforts to prioritize profit over child safety. He stated that the legislature acted unanimously to implement necessary guardrails. California Attorney General Rob Bonta’s office is currently reviewing the filing and remains committed to defending the state’s online protection laws. ## Recent Legal Precedents The lawsuit follows recent judicial setbacks for tech companies regarding minor safety. A Los Angeles jury previously found Meta and YouTube liable for a plaintiff's social media addiction during childhood. Additionally, a New Mexico jury recently determined that Meta violated consumer protection laws, resulting in penalties totaling 375 million dollars for negligence regarding minor safety. ## Scope of the Legislation The Digital Age Assurance Act applies regardless of whether parental consent is obtained for the minor's account. TikTok noted that this law is more restrictive than a similar bill passed in 2024, which is also currently facing separate legal challenges. The state legislature designed these measures specifically to address concerns about platform-induced addictive behaviors. ## Future Judicial Outlook The outcome of this case will likely hinge on the balance between state-level consumer protection and federal constitutional protections for digital platforms. As the January 1 implementation date approaches, the court must decide if the state's interest in child safety outweighs the First Amendment rights claimed by these major social media corporations. ## Sources covering this story - https://deadline.com/2026/11/california-social-media-law-youtube-tiktok-facebook-1237214954/ — --- _Summary written by Brifing from the original reporting. Copyright in the original article belongs to its publisher; read the full piece at the link above._