Brifing

South Korea Blocks Access to Polymarket Over Gambling Concerns

Authorities determined the prediction market platform facilitates illegal gambling activities.

CryptoPotato2 min

1South Korea imposes access ban on Polymarket

South Korea has blocked domestic access to Polymarket, determining the platform facilitates illegal gambling activities. The Korea Media and Communications Commission announced on August 18 that its subcommittee reviewed the platform and approved access restrictions. The decision was based on findings that Polymarket's structure encourages gambling behavior through wagers on events outside users' control. The platform argued it had removed Korean-language services and disabled KRW payments to comply with regulations, but authorities rejected this defense.

2Legal arguments rejected by authorities

South Korean officials stated that technical changes or service methods don't exempt platforms from complying with local laws. Polymarket came under scrutiny in late May when police began investigating users for suspected gambling. The media watchdog launched its own review on July 6 before concluding the platform 'encourages gambling behavior.' This marks another significant regulatory challenge for the prediction market, which has faced increasing global scrutiny.

3Following France's earlier ban

South Korea isn't the first country to restrict Polymarket. France blocked the platform last month over concerns about user losses and potential betting manipulation. Australia and Germany classified it as an illegal gambling service in 2025, imposing access restrictions. Over 30 countries including Italy, Indonesia, and Argentina have also blocked or restricted Polymarket, reflecting growing regulatory consensus against prediction markets operating as gambling platforms.

4Legal troubles escalate in the US

Pressure on prediction markets is mounting in the US as well. Baltimore officials filed lawsuits against both Polymarket and Kalshi on August 13. The city and Mayor Brandon M. Scott accuse the platforms of offering sports betting without required Maryland licenses. Complaints allege the companies misrepresented their products as legal and regulated. Baltimore argues calling them 'event contracts' or prediction markets doesn't change their fundamental nature as betting platforms.

5Baltimore seeks significant penalties

The Baltimore lawsuits seek various legal remedies including penalties, consumer restitution, and disgorgement of profits. Meanwhile, Kalshi faces separate legal challenges from New York officials regarding its operations in the state. These cases highlight the uncertain legal status of prediction markets across different US jurisdictions. The outcomes could set important precedents for how such platforms are regulated nationwide.

6Polymarket's growing global legal challenges

Polymarket faces intensifying legal pressure worldwide as more countries classify it as an illegal gambling service. South Korea's decision establishes an important precedent for applying local laws to digital platforms. Authorities consistently maintain that technical adjustments don't eliminate legal obligations. The platform's difficulties demonstrate the challenges prediction markets face in navigating diverse regulatory landscapes across multiple jurisdictions.

7Legal gray area of prediction markets

Prediction markets operate in a legal gray area in many countries. The Polymarket case highlights uncertainties about how such platforms should be classified across different jurisdictions. Some countries view them as gambling services while others consider them financial instruments. This ambiguity creates operational challenges and increases legal risks for platforms attempting global expansion without clear regulatory frameworks.

8Future of crypto-based prediction markets

The legal challenges facing Polymarket and similar platforms raise questions about the future of crypto-based prediction markets. Increasing regulatory scrutiny could hinder sector growth, though some experts advocate for creating clear regulatory frameworks. South Korea's decision may serve as an important reference point for global regulators grappling with how to classify and oversee these innovative but controversial platforms.

Original article: CryptoPotato — Güney Kore, Polymarket'e Erişimi Yasakladı