# After the AI Bubble: A Critical Manifesto for Human-Centric Computing Challenging the economic and social impacts of the current artificial intelligence speculative bubble. - **Source:** [UX Collective - Medium](https://brifing.si/source/5c6bdc88-e150-4203-af43-069801e37dd9) - **Published:** 2026-11-06 - **Topic:** [Business](https://brifing.si/c/business) - **Original article:** - **On Brifing:** https://brifing.si/s/f17b84ff-4ccf-4a32-8f67-67a670c35bbf ## The AI Bubble Reality The current artificial intelligence landscape functions as a speculative bubble rather than a sustainable technological revolution. Much like the dot-com or crypto eras, investment is driven by momentum rather than tangible business returns. Companies are losing significant capital, and the promised productivity gains remain largely unproven in the broader economy. ## Economic Risks of Hype Speculative bubbles historically precede periods of economic hardship and social conflict. While proponents argue that infrastructure like datacenters will provide lasting value, these assets are highly specific to AI loads and lack the durability of historical innovations like dark fiber. Protecting these investments through state intervention risks misallocating critical capital resources. ## The Myth of Determinism Technology is not a law of nature but a series of design choices made by individuals. The narrative of AI fatalism suggests that current developments are inevitable, forcing users to accept them or be left behind. This mindset distracts from practical issues like data privacy, customer service automation, and environmental impacts. ## CEO-Driven Journalism Pitfalls The phenomenon of CEO-said journalism allows executives to propagate unsubstantiated claims without rigorous challenge. By focusing on grandiose fantasies about AI saving or destroying the world, media outlets ignore the immediate, mundane realities of implementation. Journalists have a moral obligation to scrutinize the actual merits of these powerful, well-capitalized companies. ## Anthropomorphism and Deception Large language models are frequently designed to mimic human personality, which is a deceptive practice. By using first-person pronouns and names, these tools create a false sense of equality between the user and the machine. This power imbalance diminishes human dignity, especially when individuals are forced to interact with machines for essential services. ## Information Durability Issues AI tools often fail to organize information in a durable, interoperable way. Unlike traditional databases, AI-generated insights are rarely stored as permanent, linkable records. This creates a cycle of deepening informational chaos, where the illusion of a helpful assistant masks the lack of actual, structured, and accessible knowledge management for users. ## The Siren Server Model Modern tech companies leverage the siren server model, gaining competitive advantage by hoarding massive datasets. This business strategy prioritizes scale over innovation, leading to invasive advertising and high barriers to exit. These platforms are designed to trap users, turning previously open services into closed systems that prioritize monetization over user utility. ## Enshittification of Digital Platforms The lifecycle of modern platforms often follows a pattern of degradation known as enshittification. Initially, services offer low prices to attract users, but they eventually degrade performance to maximize revenue. This model is inherently misaligned with user needs and represents a regression in the quality of digital infrastructure and information access. ## Displacement of Human Labor Generative AI companies are perfecting the siren server model by aggregating data to simulate human output. This leads to the economic displacement of creative professionals, including writers, designers, and translators. By replacing human labor with simulated alternatives, these companies undermine the value of human expertise and the integrity of creative work. ## Reclaiming Human Agency Computers should serve as tools for human freedom rather than mechanisms for control. The current malaise of fatalism can be overcome by recognizing that we have the power to direct technological development. We must prioritize individual liberty and the general welfare, moving away from capital-intensive fads toward more humane computing practices. ## Call for Collective Action The authors invite feedback and collaboration to strengthen this manifesto for a more sustainable future. By challenging the current economic regime and demanding transparency, society can steer technology toward beneficial outcomes. Signing this document represents a commitment to building a future that protects human dignity against the excesses of corporate AI. ## Future Economic Transition Transitioning to a stable economy requires broader investments that benefit society beyond the tech sector. We must move past the cycle of fast-growing fads that prioritize short-term speculation over long-term stability. The goal is to foster an environment where technology supports, rather than exploits, the diverse needs of the global population. ## Sources covering this story - https://uxdesign.cc/after-the-ai-bubble-a-manifesto-2e3157387662?source=rss----138adf9c44c---4 — --- _Summary written by Brifing from the original reporting. Copyright in the original article belongs to its publisher; read the full piece at the link above._