# Cornell Rape Case Lawyer Faces Death Threats Amid Legal Battle

Attorney Thomas Giuffra reports intimidation as the university faces internal turmoil over sexual assault.

- **Source:** [20 Minutes](https://www.20minutes.fr)
- **Published:** 2026-11-07
- **Topic:** [politics](https://brifing.si/c/politics)
- **Original article:** <https://www.20minutes.fr/monde/etats-unis/4261169-20261107-viols-universite-cornell-abandonnez-vais-tuer-femme-avocat-jane-doe-menace?at_medium=display&at_campaign=149>
- **On Brifing:** https://brifing.si/s/f4e3ef46-07c5-4c1d-82e8-36f40857a033

## Escalating Legal Intimidation

Attorney Thomas Giuffra, representing a victim in the Cornell University sexual assault case, reported receiving direct death threats. An anonymous caller threatened to kill his wife if he did not drop the case. This follows a disturbing swatting incident where police arrived at the victim's home after a false report.

## The Cornell Case Origins

The case, known as the Cornell 7, involves a 20-year-old student who accused seven fraternity members of gang rape in 2024. The victim alleges she was incapacitated by alcohol and ketamine during the assault. She filed a formal complaint, sparking a national conversation regarding campus safety and institutional accountability for survivors.

## Systemic Campus Challenges

Giuffra, who previously represented Harvey Weinstein victims, argues that the current legal and social climate discourages survivors from coming forward. He suggests that the harassment faced by his client sends a dangerous message to other victims. Data from 2020 indicates nearly one in four American female students experiences sexual assault during college.

## University Administrative Response

Cornell University responded by closing the involved fraternity and suspending the accused students, two of whom were eventually expelled. The administration also commissioned an independent investigation into its handling of the case. Despite these measures, critics argue that the university's initial response was inadequate and failed to protect the student body.

## Faculty Vote of No-Confidence

Tensions reached a peak when the university faculty voted on a motion of no-confidence against the leadership. While the vote lacks the power to remove officials, it serves as a significant rebuke to President Michael Kotlikoff. The victim has directly implicated the president in her criticisms regarding the university's management of the case.

## Board of Trustees Stance

In a move that highlights the ongoing divide on campus, the university's board of trustees publicly affirmed their support for President Kotlikoff. This decision contradicts the faculty's recent vote and suggests a continued struggle between the administration and the academic staff. The situation remains a focal point for national discourse on campus.

## Broader Institutional Reform

The victim intends for her legal action to force a transformation in how American universities handle sexual assault allegations. Her case has become a catalyst for demanding better support systems and transparency. The ongoing legal battle highlights the difficulty of achieving institutional change when faced with entrenched administrative structures and external pressure.

## The Path Forward

As the legal proceedings continue, the focus remains on the safety of the survivor and the integrity of the judicial process. The case serves as a critical test for Cornell's commitment to reform. Observers are watching to see if the university will implement lasting changes to prevent future instances of sexual violence.

## Sources covering this story

- https://www.20minutes.fr/monde/etats-unis/4261169-20261107-viols-universite-cornell-abandonnez-vais-tuer-femme-avocat-jane-doe-menace?at_medium=display&at_campaign=149 — 

---

_Summary written by Brifing from the original reporting. Copyright in the original article belongs to its publisher; read the full piece at the link above._
