# Government-Owned Power Plants Lag in Global Emission Reduction Efforts State-controlled utilities are slower to cut carbon emissions than private, investor-owned energy facilities. - **Source:** [The Conversation – US](https://theconversation.com/us) - **Published:** 2026-11-10 - **Topic:** [climate](https://brifing.si/c/climate) - **Original article:** - **On Brifing:** https://brifing.si/s/f5afac2c-2b8e-4b68-912b-e06bef7acdda ## State Utilities Underperform Research covering 13,661 power plants across 134 countries reveals that government-owned facilities are significantly slower at reducing carbon emissions. While these plants represent 38% of the total sample, they account for 69% of carbon pollution. This trend persists despite various national regulatory and pricing measures designed to curb electricity sector emissions. ## Emission Disparities by Ownership Government-owned plants emit an average of 910,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide annually. This figure is three times higher than the 290,000 tons produced by investor-owned facilities and eight times higher than cooperatively owned plants. These state-run entities frequently rely on coal, which remains the dirtiest fuel source for power generation. ## Limited Policy Effectiveness Investor-owned utilities responded effectively to carbon taxes, emission trading systems, and fossil fuel subsidy reforms between 2009 and 2018. Conversely, government-owned plants showed little response to these policies. Only renewable portfolio standards, which mandate a shift toward cleaner energy, were statistically associated with significant emission cuts within the state-owned utility sector. ## Competing Institutional Pressures State-owned utilities face unique pressures, including mandates to provide affordable electricity, support job growth, and generate tax revenue. In many nations, these utilities are also expected to maintain energy security, often leading to a reliance on coal. These conflicting goals make it difficult for state managers to prioritize rapid decarbonization efforts. ## The Eskom Case Study South Africa’s Eskom illustrates the challenges of state-owned energy. As the nation's largest polluter, it provides 90% of the country's power. Despite climate commitments, emissions remained stagnant throughout the 2010s. Recent reductions of 16% since 2019 were driven largely by power outages and increased adoption of private home solar energy solutions. ## Regulatory Conflict of Interest A fundamental conflict arises when governments act as both the regulator and the owner of a utility. Officials may be reluctant to impose strict costs that could increase electricity prices for the public. This dual role complicates the enforcement of environmental standards, potentially shielding state-run plants from the necessary financial accountability. ## Targeted Accountability Strategies Governments can improve performance by setting specific emission-reduction targets for individual plants rather than the sector as a whole. Ireland successfully utilized this approach, reducing electricity-related emissions by over 25% between 2019 and 2025. Tying management performance reviews and investment approvals to these measurable goals ensures that policies translate into action. ## Pathways for Future Progress To meet global climate goals, leaders must ensure state-owned utilities actively respond to environmental policies. International financing, as seen in Morocco, can help state agencies expand solar capacity while protecting consumers from price hikes. Transparency through publishing plant-level emission data remains essential for identifying laggards and ensuring consistent progress toward decarbonization. ## Sources covering this story - https://theconversation.com/cop31-governments-are-failing-to-rein-in-emissions-from-their-own-power-plants-295592 — --- _Summary written by Brifing from the original reporting. Copyright in the original article belongs to its publisher; read the full piece at the link above._