# Neon Announces Creative Commons SCP Foundation Film Studio pledges CC license after A24's controversial approach to the horror franchise. - **Source:** [The Verge](https://www.theverge.com) - **Published:** 2026-09-30 - **Topic:** [Business](https://brifing.si/c/business) - **Original article:** - **On Brifing:** https://brifing.si/s/f67d9f60-0781-4aa9-a32a-6c0f738a0f61 ## Neon's strategic move Neon capitalized on A24's misstep by announcing its own SCP Foundation film with proper Creative Commons licensing. Unlike A24, Neon proactively engaged the SCP Wiki team before development. The studio committed to releasing under CC BY-SA, aligning with the wiki's requirements. This contrasts sharply with A24's approach of developing without consultation. ## Licensing controversy A24 faced backlash for developing an SCP film without contacting the wiki team or committing to Creative Commons. The SCP community requires CC licensing for adaptations. Neon's announcement positions it as respecting community norms while A24 appeared dismissive of established protocols in the horror fanbase. ## Production details sparse Beyond licensing, Neon revealed few specifics about its SCP film. The 2027 theatrical release suggests a rapid production timeline. The ShareAlike license may indicate a lower budget approach, as profit potential is constrained when anyone can legally redistribute the film. No wiki staff are involved in production. ## Community response SCP Wiki admins praised Neon's communication and license compliance, calling it aligned with their collaborative spirit. This contrasts with their silence on A24's project. The endorsement gives Neon credibility despite no official wiki involvement in the film's creative direction or financial stake. ## Business implications Neon's move demonstrates how studios can leverage licensing controversies for PR advantage. By embracing open licensing early, they avoid backlash while potentially attracting SCP fans. However, the CC model presents unique profitability challenges for theatrical releases compared to traditional copyright. ## Production challenges Films under ShareAlike licenses face unconventional distribution economics. Anyone can legally copy and share the movie post-release, eliminating exclusive windows. This may limit theatrical revenue but could create alternative monetization opportunities through merchandise or special events. ## Franchise potential The SCP Foundation's vast lore offers rich adaptation material, but its collaborative nature complicates commercialization. Neon's approach suggests testing the waters with one film before potential sequels. Success could inspire more CC-licensed franchise films, challenging traditional studio models. ## Industry precedent This marks a rare major studio embrace of ShareAlike licensing for theatrical features. The outcome may influence how Hollywood approaches crowdsourced IP. If successful, it could encourage more studios to engage directly with online creator communities when adapting their work. ## Sources covering this story - https://www.theverge.com/entertainment/1002958/neon-a24-creative-commons-scp-foundation-movie — --- _Summary written by Brifing from the original reporting. Copyright in the original article belongs to its publisher; read the full piece at the link above._