# Belgian Expert Validates Documents in Katumbi-Katebe Legal Dispute

Forensic analysis confirms signatures in a property case involving Congolese politician Moïse Katumbi.

- **Source:** [RFI – Afrique](https://www.rfi.fr/fr/afrique)
- **Published:** 2026-11-09
- **Topic:** [politics](https://brifing.si/c/politics)
- **Original article:** <https://www.rfi.fr/fr/afrique/20261109-rdc-une-experte-belge-confirme-la-v%C3%A9racit%C3%A9-des-documents-d%C3%A9nonc%C3%A9s-dans-le-dossier-katumbi-katebe>
- **On Brifing:** https://brifing.si/s/f6d96056-97c2-4dfe-8516-992c1ba4f152

## Forensic Authentication Confirmed

A Belgian judicial expert, Françoise Coenraets, has officially verified the authenticity of seven disputed documents. These papers are central to a property litigation case involving Congolese opposition figure Moïse Katumbi and his brother, Raphaël Katebe Katoto. The expert expressed 100% certainty that the signatures and handwritten texts belong to Katebe Katoto.

## Disputed Property Transactions

The legal conflict centers on real estate transactions dating back to 2005 and 2006. Five documents concern the sale of a villa in Lubumbashi, including payment confirmation records. Two additional acts involve buildings located in Kashobwe and an installation in Kalemie. Raphaël Katebe Katoto has consistently denied signing these specific legal instruments.

## High Stakes for Katumbi

Moïse Katumbi, a prominent candidate in the 2023 presidential election, faces serious legal jeopardy before the Court of Cassation. If convicted of using forged documents, he risks imprisonment. Furthermore, an irrevocable conviction could lead to a period of ineligibility, effectively barring him from holding public office during the term of his sentence.

## Methodology of the Analysis

Expert Françoise Coenraets was commissioned by Brussels-based lawyer Fabian Tchékémian to conduct the forensic review. She compared the seven contested documents against three reference samples deemed authentic. The expert concluded her findings without any reservations, providing a definitive assessment that challenges the denials previously issued by Raphaël Katebe Katoto regarding the signatures.

## Defense Strategy and Arguments

The legal team representing Moïse Katumbi is actively utilizing the expert report to bolster their position. They are also highlighting the Belgian nationality of Raphaël Katebe Katoto, citing extracts from the Belgian national registry. The defense is simultaneously challenging the overall regularity of the judicial procedure and has formally requested the reopening of debates.

## Silence from the Complainant

When approached by media outlets for comment regarding the forensic validation of his signatures, Raphaël Katebe Katoto declined to provide a statement. He indicated that he would refrain from commenting on the matter until the Court of Cassation officially pronounces its verdict, maintaining his distance from the ongoing public discourse surrounding the case.

## Judicial Process and Uncertainty

The Court of Cassation now holds the responsibility of evaluating the expert report alongside the procedural challenges raised by the defense. While the forensic evidence provides a technical breakthrough, the final legal impact remains subject to the court's interpretation of both the document authenticity and the broader procedural arguments presented by the parties.

## Broader Political Implications

This legal battle between the two brothers occurs against a backdrop of complex political tensions in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Beyond the property dispute, the case reflects deeper familial and political divisions, including differing stances on constitutional reform. The outcome will likely influence the political trajectory of the opposition leader involved.

## Sources covering this story

- https://www.rfi.fr/fr/afrique/20261109-rdc-une-experte-belge-confirme-la-v%C3%A9racit%C3%A9-des-documents-d%C3%A9nonc%C3%A9s-dans-le-dossier-katumbi-katebe — 

---

_Summary written by Brifing from the original reporting. Copyright in the original article belongs to its publisher; read the full piece at the link above._
